Blog

  • Over half of Americans disapprove of Trump’s second term: Survey

    Over half of Americans disapprove of Trump’s second term: Survey

    play

    Within the first 100 days of his second administration President Donald Trump has been incredibly busy, implementing major changes from enacting tariffs to targeting diversity initiatives.  

    But Americans are divided about whether the changes have been good, according to a recent survey of more than 900 voters conducted by the New York Times and Siena College Research Institute.

    Around 54% of participants said they disapprove of the president’s handling of the economy, immigration, foreign trade and the war between Russia and Ukraine.

    The poll reported that 56% of participants said Trump has “gone too far” with changes from enacting tariffs, advancing immigration enforcement and cutting the federal work force.

    When asked to describe the second Trump Administration, 66% called his term “chaotic” while 42% used “exciting” and 59% said “scary,” according to the poll.

    Overall, his approval rating was at 42%.

    Americans criticize economy but support immigration

    Though confidence in Trump’s ability to manage the economy was a key selling point to many voters in the November election, 76% of participants said they disapprove of how he’s handling it, the survey said.

    While 45% said their personal finances are in good shape, 44% expect to be hurt personally by his economic policies.

    Around 52% disapproved Trump’s suggestion to U.S. citizen to prison in El Salvador, the Times/Siena poll reported.

    Around 47% opposed the administration’s decision to roll back diversity, equity and inclusion programs, and 58% opposed with holding federal funding from certain universities, the survey reported.

    Musk has lower approval rating than Trump, poll reports

    The world’s richest man, Elon Musk, also received a low approval rating during his stint spearheading the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) alongside Trump.

    The Tesla CEO and presidential adviser received an approval rating of just 35%, the survey reported, with skeptics split a consistently across gender, age, racial and educational demographics.

    Survey conductors asked participants twice about the DOGE cuts, once mentioning Musk’s name and again without, according to the Times. Responders were more fond of the cuts when they didn’t hear the name “Musk.”

    Trump’s 100th day in office is on Wednesday, April 30.

  • Elon Musk Could Make Mars His Next Business Venture

    Elon Musk Could Make Mars His Next Business Venture

    Elon Musk is leaving his full-time Washington assignment next month to try to save Tesla (which has seen its stock battered), to keep up with SpaceX (which is positioned to do big business with the Trump administration) and to chart a new course for xAI, which he just combined with X itself.

    He’s a busy guy. So what’s another company — or three?

    Two months ago, even as Musk appeared consumed by his work at yet another job, at the Department of Government Efficiency, his top adviser, Jared Birchall, quietly created an intriguing-sounding set of limited-liability companies in Texas, whose existence has not been previously reported.

    Their names: Red Planet I, II and III.

    For the world’s richest man, who is pursuing an elaborate, decades-long plan to colonize Mars, this seemed no idle corporate filing.

    When Musk bought Twitter, after all, he formed three holding companies (X Holdings I, II and III) to execute the transaction.

    So, is he planning to buy Mars?

    Birchall hasn’t returned my requests for comment since I learned of the LLCs a few weeks ago. But he doesn’t typically take actions like this without his boss’s direction. He registered them on Feb. 25, listing himself as the manager of each and using an Austin address that other Musk entities have used.

    Still, it is surprising to see Musk take this step now, when he has so much on his plate and is already facing pressure to do less, not more. On a Tesla earnings call last week, he said he would substantially reduce the amount of time he spent on DOGE to spend more time on the car company, whose quarterly revenue is way down from a year ago.

    And yet here he goes again, sprawling out even more.

    Birchall runs Musk’s family office, called Excession. To hold that job is to do anything and everything for your demanding client. A Brigham Young University graduate from Modesto, Calif., Birchall has been Musk’s all-purpose fixer for a decade now. His remit is as wild as Musk’s life: He addresses issues with Musk’s romantic partners. He helped Musk master the extraordinarily complicated finances of his acquisition of Twitter. He once even hired a private investigator on Musk’s behalf, though he did so under a pseudonym. (“I work in finance. I have a family. This isn’t what I do,” he later testified.)

    And when Musk’s pursuits took him to Mar-a-Lago, there was Birchall by his side. My colleagues and I reported in December that Birchall, who had no experience in foreign affairs, was interviewing candidates for jobs at the State Department along with advising the Trump transition team on other matters.

    The companies that Birchall has set up for Musk include a philanthropy, an early-childhood school and a now-defunct entity called Pravda Corp., which Musk said would rate the accuracy of individual journalists. It later became clear that this was a joke. At least to a degree.

    But is Red Planet a joke?

    Some corporate entities, and their names, can be insignificant. A company might be created for a specific real-estate purchase or to be responsible for a specific business operation, and to ensure that any problems there don’t bleed into other endeavors owned by the same person or business.

    But the words “Red Planet” don’t have the ring of insignificance — not for Musk, who wants SpaceX to send humans to the red planet, who declared last month that an unmanned crew would go to Mars by the end of 2026, who suggested that “human landings” could occur as soon as 2029 and who on Friday reposted (not for the first time) a clip featuring President Trump urging him to “get those rocket ships going because we want to reach Mars before the end of my term.”

    Musk has also occasionally referred to Mars by that nickname. “Technology must advance faster or there will be no city on the red planet in our lifetime,” he wrote in 2020.

    A fun twist to this mystery is that there is already a company called Red Planet Ventures, and its founder, John Spencer, says he knows Musk.

    Spencer founded Red Planet Ventures in California in 2001, around the time that Musk moved to Los Angeles. Spencer said he got to know Musk “really well.” In fact, Spencer said he was part of the group of people who introduced Musk to Gwynne Shotwell, now the C.E.O. of SpaceX.

    Spencer said he last talked to Musk in 2014, when Musk spoke at a conference he helped chair. Spencer said that he, Musk and the astronaut Buzz Aldrin all spoke in the event’s green room for about half an hour.

    Told of Musk’s new LLCs, Spencer, whose Red Planet Ventures involves “space tourism,” gently suggested that “there might be issues with name stuff down the line.”

    “I don’t know what they’re planning with their Red Planet,” Spencer said, adding, “But I’d like to know.”

    So would I. Email me if you do: theodore.schleifer@nytimes.com.

    MEANWHILE on X

    My colleague Tiffany Hsu, who covers technology and political speech, looks at how Musk has been busy using X to attack judges and fuel the idea of an unconstitutional third Trump term.

    On Friday, Musk shared a post from Kash Patel, the director of the F.B.I., that praised agents in Milwaukee for arresting Hannah Dugan, a sitting state court judge in Wisconsin, on charges of obstructing immigration agents trying to apprehend an undocumented immigrant in her courtroom. “More judicial corruption,” Musk captioned one of several posts about the arrest, which constituted a major escalation in the Trump administration’s efforts to force his agenda on local authorities.

    Musk seconded Kari Lake, a Trump loyalist, who reacted to a court order blocking the Defense Department from halting medical care for transgender troops by posting that “these judges are out of control.” He reposted a comment calling for cuts to “the federal judiciary’s budget and power.” And, after Vice President JD Vance used the word “lawless” on X to describe district court judges who rejected Trump’s wishes, Musk added the post to his own feed.

    Musk also added his voice to Trump’s increasing talk of seeking another four years in office, which the Constitution explicitly prohibits. Musk amplified one post suggesting that “the real problem” isn’t who spends multiple terms in the White House but rather members of Congress who serve for decades on Capitol Hill. And he wrote, “Think ahead!” above a reposted image of a red hat emblazoned with “Trump 2032.”

    you shouldn’t miss

    Please indulge me as I plug a story I had a hand in.

    Several of my colleagues and I reported this week several behind-the-scenes details about the forces that led Musk to promise to reduce his time in Washington, including that he told friends he was frustrated by his interactions with Trump’s trade advisers; that Trump has sometimes told associates that he wanted to see Musk return to his companies; and that Trump had not been aware of a plan to brief Musk at the Pentagon on sensitive national security matters.

    How will Musk’s cost-cutting initiative fare after Musk leaves? One of his closest friends, Shaun Maguire, likened DOGE to SpaceX’s Falcon 9 rocket, whose initial thrust of energy is enough to achieve escape velocity — overcoming gravity even after it has separated from its engines.

    “At this point, a rocket is only a couple hundred kilometers from Earth, but it has escaped its gravity well and can travel far into the solar system,” Maguire told me in an interview. “DOGE has escaped D.C.’s gravity well.”

    Read more here.

  • Musk demoted again! Elon retreats as he loses  billion PER DAY under Trump

    Musk demoted again! Elon retreats as he loses $1 billion PER DAY under Trump

    IE 11 is not supported. For an optimal experience visit our site on another browser.

    • Trump slump wipes out $6 trillion: People cut snacks & drinks in recession fears

      06:09

    • Now Playing

      Musk demoted again! Elon retreats as he loses $1 billion PER DAY under Trump

      11:52

    • UP NEXT

      Wow: Trump’s DEI gambit debunked by Al Sharpton, Nems on ‘Bing Bong Biden’

      13:26

    • ‘Move?!’ Stopping MAGA means taking this bold step, say activists

      07:55

    • Raid the shelves? Trump’s failed trade war stokes panic, 47’s polls crash below Obama, Biden, Bush

      11:50

    • MAGA ‘Red Scare’: Trump rebuked by judge for anti free speech order, after big SCOTUS loss

      07:35

    • Raid the shelves?! Trump’s failed tariffs spark warning from Walmart after trillions lost

      11:55

    • Trump’s ‘Constitutional crisis’ vs. SCOTUS! Ari & Nobel Peace Prize winner on fighting repression

      07:51

    • That was fast! Trump slumps ‘Great Depression Month’ & rattles MAGA as numbers don’t lie

      11:35

    • Losing at red line! Trump hits brick wall in 7-2 SCOTUS loss, Melber reports on coalition vs. 47

      18:54

    • Trump now a ‘historic failure’ in 100 days: WashPo’s Milbank on Trump slump & legal losses

      08:30

    • Back down? Trump now claims he’s ‘not involved’ in foreign prison debacle, after SCOTUS loss

      11:26

    • From ‘Atlanta’ to ‘Dope Thief’: Brian Tyree Henry from the drug war to campaign trail (Melber Intv)

      25:51

    • Showdown: Trump tests Supreme Court as judges warn of ‘contempt’ punishment: Melber Report

      11:04

    • Trump’s nightmare disaster: Ari Melber reports on how Musk cuts could backfire on America and GOP

      19:52

    • From losing to ‘crisis’: Decoding Trump ploy to defy his SCOTUS loss

      11:38

    • Trump vs. Harvard: Obama hails alma matter for defying Trump’s ‘unlawful’ demands

      05:57

    • After $6.4 trillion loss, Trump-China clash escalates: Kevin O’Leary on small biz & IP

      07:38

    • Trump’s prison deportation plot: Ari Melber decodes Trump’s ‘dangerous’ evasion of SCOTUS loss

      11:55

    • Chaos grips markets as Trump’s $6,400,000,000,000 mistake sinks economy despite 47’s retreat

      06:06

    President Trump’s tariffs continue to cause economic problems, and his public approval is falling underwater across multiple polls this week including Pew, the Economist, Reuters and Fox News. MSNBC’s Ari Melber reports. (The Beat’s YouTube playlist: https://msnbc.com/ari Beat merch: www.msnbc.com/Beat5)

  • How much has Elon Musk’s Doge cut from US government spending?

    How much has Elon Musk’s Doge cut from US government spending?

    Lucy Gilder, Jake Horton and the Data Science team

    BBC Verify

    BBC An image of Elon Musk holding a chainsaw above his head at the conservative conference CPAC with the BBC Verify lozenge in the top left corner.BBC

    Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency (Doge) – set up to cut US government spending – claims to have saved, on average, more than $10bn a week since President Trump entered office.

    “We’re talking about almost $200bn and rising fast,” Trump told the BBC when talking about Mr Musk’s cost-cutting drive on 23 April.

    Doge’s website says it is focusing on cancelling contracts, grants and leases put in place by previous administrations, as well as tackling fraud and reducing the government workforce.

    BBC Verify has looked at the agency’s biggest claimed savings, examining the figures and speaking to experts.

    Our analysis found that behind some of the large numbers, there is a lack of evidence to back them up.

    How does Doge report savings?

    In October, Mr Musk pledged to cut “at least $2 trillion” from the federal government budget. He subsequently halved this target and on 10 April talked about making savings of $150bn from “cutting fraud and waste” by the end of the next financial year in 2026.

    The US federal budget for the last financial year was $6.75tn.

    Doge publishes a running total of its estimated savings on its website – which stood at $160bn the last time the site was updated on 20 April.

    However, less than 40% of this figure is broken down into individual savings.

    We downloaded the data from the Doge website on 23 April and added up the total claimed savings from contracts, grants and leases.

    Our analysis found only about half of these itemised savings had a link to a document or other form of evidence.

    A chart comparing the initial pledges made by Elon Musk with current claimed Doge savings - listed is $2 trillion initial pledged, $1 trillion revised pledge, $160 billion current estimated savings, $61.5 billion in itemised savings, $32.5 billion savings with a receipt attached

    US media has also highlighted some accounting errors, including Doge mistakenly claiming to have saved $8bn from cancelling an immigration contract which in fact had a total value of $8m.

    Doge says it is working to upload all receipts in a “digestible and transparent manner” and that, as of 20 April, it has posted receipts “representing around 30% of all total savings”. It also lists some receipts as being “unavailable for legal reasons”.

    What’s the evidence behind the biggest saving?

    BBC Verify examined the four largest savings listed on the Doge website which had receipts attached.

    The department claims these add up to $8.3bn, but after examining the evidence provided and speaking to people familiar with federal contracts, this figure appears to be overstated.

    For three of the savings, Doge links to documents on the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS). This is a database which records contracts given out by the US government.

    The documents show a contract’s start and end date, the maximum amount the government has agreed to spend, and how much of that has been spent.

    David Drabkin, a federal contracts expert who helped develop the FPDS database, said the maximum figure listed should be treated with caution.

    “FPDS does not reflect the actual paid price until some period of time after the contract has been completed and the contract actions have been recorded,” he says.

    “For example, when buying research and development into a vaccine no one really knows how much that’s going to cost – so when a price is set, it’s not a definite price but rather an upper limit.”

    So if Doge counts the maximum figure, that can represent projected spending over a number of years, rather than a direct saving from the country’s yearly spending.

    Reuters Donald Trump talks while standing next to Tesla CEO Elon Musk, with a red Tesla car and the White House in the background
Reuters

    Elon Musk has said he will reduce his work with Doge to focus on his other companies such as Tesla

    Doge’s largest listed individual saving is $2.9bn.

    It comes from cancelling a contract – which started in 2023 under President Biden – for a facility in Texas to house up to 3,000 unaccompanied migrant children.

    Doge appears to have taken the “total contract value” until 2028 – the end date listed – and subtracted the amount spent so far to get the $2.9bn figure.

    But the contract was reviewed annually, meaning renewing it until 2028 was not guaranteed.

    A source familiar with this contract – who spoke on condition of anonymity – told BBC Verify that Doge’s figure is “based on speculative, never-used figures” and that the actual spending depended on how many children were placed at the facility and the services they required.

    “In truth, the government never incurred those costs and could never reach that ceiling amount. The real, documentable savings from early termination were approximately $153 million”, they estimated.

    They say this figure comes from tallying up the $18m per month fixed running costs (for things like staffing and security at the facility) from February – when Doge announced the cut – to November – when the contract was subject to annual review.

    They also told us that the site – which closed on the same day as the Doge announcement – never reached its maximum capacity of 3,000 children, and about 2,000 stayed at the Texas facility at its peak, before numbers fell significantly as border crossings decreased.

    We contacted the Administration for Children and Families and the Department for Health and Human Services which awarded the contract but are yet to hear back.

    What about the other big savings?

    The second largest saving listed by Doge comes from cancelling a contract between the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and an IT company called Centennial Technologies which it claims was worth $1.9bn.

    The document which Doge links to has a total contract value of $1.9bn and all of the other cost fields, including the amount already spent, are for $0.

    However, Mr Drabkin told us this does not necessarily mean that nothing had been spent on the contract.

    He said several government departments have poor recording keeping, meaning the amount spent during some contracts might not always be updated in a timely fashion.

    The contract start date is listed as August 2024 and was estimated to run until 2031.

    However, Centennial Technologies’ CEO told the New York Times that the agreement had actually been cancelled last autumn during the Biden administration.

    The company did not respond to our requests for further comment.

    Getty Elon Musk speaks during a cabinet meeting held by President Donald Trump at the White HouseGetty

    Elon Musk has attended the Trump administration’s cabinet meetings

    Another IT contract, this time with the Department of Defense, is the third largest claimed saving.

    Doge says $1.76bn was saved by cancelling a contract with an IT services company called A1FEDIMPACT.

    On the contract document, the total value is listed as $2.4bn. An online database of government contracts called Higher Gov says this amount was the ceiling value.

    Again, there is $0 recorded for the amount that had been spent at the time the contract was terminated.

    It is unclear where Doge’s figure of $1.76bn comes from – we have asked the Pentagon and the supplier about it.

    The fourth largest claimed saving of $1.75bn comes from cancelling a USAID grant to Gavi, a global health organisation, which campaigns to improve access to vaccines.

    Doge links to a page on USASpending.gov. It shows a grant was paid to Gavi in three instalments, during the Biden administration, totalling $880m.

    Gavi confirmed that $880m had been paid out by USAID but said it had not been told the grant had been terminated.

    “Gavi has not received a termination notice related to this grant,” a spokesperson told us.

    We have not found any evidence for the $1.75bn saving claimed by Doge, and a source familiar with the contract said it was unclear where it comes from.

    We asked the USAID Office of Inspector General about the grant but it did not respond to us.

    While Doge may have cut a significant amount of government spending, the lack of evidence provided for its biggest claimed savings makes it impossible to independently confirm exactly how much.

    Doge does not have a press office but BBC Verify has contacted the White House to ask for more evidence of these claimed savings.

    Additional reporting by Ned Davies and Alison Benjamin.

    BBC Verify logo
  • DOGE says it has saved 0 billion. Those cuts have cost taxpayers 5 billion, one analysis says.

    DOGE says it has saved $160 billion. Those cuts have cost taxpayers $135 billion, one analysis says.

    Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE, says it has saved $160 billion through its push to root out wasteful or fraudulent government spending. But that effort may also have come at a cost for taxpayers, with a new analysis from a nonpartisan research and advocacy group estimating that DOGE’s actions will cost $135 billion this fiscal year. 

    The analysis seeks to tally the costs associated with putting tens of thousands of federal employees on paid leave, re-hiring mistakenly fired workers and lost productivity, according to the Partnership for Public Service (PSP), a nonpartisan nonprofit that focuses on the federal workforce. 

    PSP’s estimate is based on the $270 billion in annual compensation costs for the federal workforce, calculating the impact of DOGE’s actions, from paid leave to productivity hits. The $135 billion cost to taxpayers doesn’t include the expense of defending multiple lawsuits challenging DOGE’s actions, nor the impact of estimated lost tax collections due to staff cuts at the IRS. 

    DOGE has sought to slash federal spending by urging government workers to accept a deferred resignation plan, which allowed many employees to retain full pay and benefits through September without working. Another 24,000 government employees who were fired as part of the reform effort have since been rehired after a court ruling

    Other agencies also have rehired some workers after mistakenly firing them, such as bird flu experts who were dismissed by the U.S. Department of Agriculture. Federal workers have also had to take on tasks such as documenting their weekly accomplishments, which has lowered productivity, Max Stier, president of the Partnership for Public Service, told CBS MoneyWatch.

    “We haven’t seen much focus on the waste [DOGE] is creating,” Stier told CBS MoneyWatch about his group’s decision to analyze the costs of DOGE’s cuts. “This is an effort that was created to address waste, but we were seeing the opposite.”

    “Ultimately it’s the public that will end up paying for this,” he added, noting that he expects the taxpayers costs to grow after other DOGE cuts take effect.

    The White House took issue with the analysis. 

    “The continued attempts to sow doubt in the massive accomplishments of this never-before-seen effort to make government more efficient speaks more about the illegitimacy of those peddling these falsehoods than good work of DOGE,” White House spokesman Harrison Fields said. “The American public are in lockstep with the president’s mission and will not be swayed by more lies coming from the legacy media.”

    Why job cuts could raise costs

    The IRS, which is planning on cutting roughly 40% of its workforce, could forego $323 billion in tax revenue over the next decade due to lower tax compliance and a decline in audits, according to an estimate from the Yale Budget Lab. 

    To be sure, the DOGE cuts could pay off over time, with a leaner, more focused federal workforce. For example, the direct savings from those layoffs will amount to $38 billion over 10 years, the Partnership for Public Service estimated.

    But Stier maintains that the costs for taxpayers could grow as they ripple through the economy, such as reductions in funding of health and science research. One analysis by researchers at institutions including the University of Maryland and University of Pennsylvania estimates that cuts to health research will result in a $16 billion annual economic loss, with 68,000 jobs lost.

    “One can always imagine a miracle occurring, but none of this makes sense on so many different levels,” Stier said. 

    DOGE’s “wall of receipts”

    DOGE keeps a running public tally of the federal money the task force says it has saved, posted on its website in what is called a “wall of receipts.” But some of those savings have been overstated, a February CBS News investigation found.

    At the same time, DOGE’s $160 billion in savings is far less than Musk’s previously stated goal of shrinking annual government spending by $2 trillion, or almost one-third of the federal budget. Many experts say that far more ambitious objective is unlikely to be achieved without cutting major federal programs like Social Security and Medicare, which President Trump has vowed not to touch. 

    Musk said Tuesday that he’ll curtail his work at DOGE starting in May. His decision comes as Tesla, the electric vehicle maker he runs, saw a 71% plunge in first-quarter profit and a 20% decline in vehicle sales as some consumers snubbed the brand due to objections to Musk’s government work. 

    Musk said he still plans to spend one to two days a week on DOGE-related work, focusing on eliminating government waste.

    “I’ll have to continue to keep doing it for the remainder of the president’s term to make sure the waste and fraud doesn’t come roaring back,” he said during Tesla’s first-quarter earnings call on Tuesday. 

  • Senators press Jared Isaacman, Trump’s pick for NASA chief, on his ties to Elon Musk

    Senators press Jared Isaacman, Trump’s pick for NASA chief, on his ties to Elon Musk

    Jared Isaacman, President Trump’s choice to lead NASA, keeps having to explain his ties to Elon Musk.

    The topic came up repeatedly during Isaacman’s nomination hearing, which the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science and Transportation held on April 9. Multiple Democratic senators pressed the 42-year-old billionaire on his relationship with the SpaceX chief, who was a prominent supporter of Trump’s campaign and is now a close adviser to the president.

  • Musk’s DOGE Allies Made FAA Staff Sign NDAs to Hide ‘Project Lift’

    Musk’s DOGE Allies Made FAA Staff Sign NDAs to Hide ‘Project Lift’

    Elon Musk’s so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) has been spearheading a multi-million dollar communications project at the Federal Aviation Administration, the agency that regulates the nation’s air travel, and employees roped into it have been forced to sign non-disclosure agreements, sources with knowledge of the situation say. 

    The situation fits into some broader patterns: Musk and DOGE have expressed significant influence over what happens at the FAA, which regulates Musk’s space company SpaceX. And as GovExec reported Thursday, Donald Trump’s administration has required employees involved with the Veterans Affairs Department’s plans to fire tens of thousands of workers to sign NDAs.

    The world’s richest man and DOGE have overseen mass firings and purges across the government, including at the FAA. At the same time, Musk has offered SpaceX’s services to the agency, providing thousands of terminals from its satellite internet business, Starlink. Two months ago, The Washington Post reported that Starlink was jockeying to replace Verizon on a $2.4 billion contract with the FAA to upgrade its systems for managing America’s airspace. Rolling Stone reported last month that FAA officials had recently ordered staffers to find tens of millions of dollars for a Starlink deal. 

    A watchdog group, the Campaign Legal Center, last month requested that the Department of Transportation’s inspector general investigate whether Starlink’s business transactions with the FAA violate conflict of interest rules, given Musk’s role with the administration. 

    “The public has a right to know that their tax dollars are being spent in the public’s best interest and not to benefit a government employee’s companies. That is why Musk, while he remains a special government employee … is required to comply with the criminal conflict of interest law,” Delaney Marsco, the Campaign Legal Center’s ethics director, tells Rolling Stone. “He cannot legally participate in contracts or similar matters that affect his financial interests in Starlink or SpaceX. To the extent Musk is directing subordinates or working on [a] project himself, any attempt by him to get government business for his companies raises serious ethics concerns.”

    Starlink has denied wanting to replace Verizon on the $2.4 billion contract. But recently, DOGE staffers who now work at the FAA have been directing FAA funds to a new initiative called “Project Lift,” and employees involved have been made to sign NDAs to keep the details under wraps, according to three sources familiar with the situation. (All sources for this story were granted anonymity due to their fears of retaliation and so they could speak candidly about sensitive matters.)

    Project Lift is meant to upgrade the FAA’s network communications to more modern technologies, and touches on some of the same work as the Verizon project, according to one source as well as an FAA worker. The source clarifies the project is about air traffic communications. (They both say the name “Project Lift” was forced on the agency by DOGE.)

    After Rolling Stone reported that FAA staffers were told to hunt for money for a Starlink deal, the source says, “They switched tactics — limited the pool of people who know about it and made them sign NDAs.” The source adds that “DOGE staffers who are now FAA employees are calling the shots.”

    An FAA spokesperson denies this timeline, but confirmed the existence of Project Lift and the basic thrust of how sources described it to Rolling Stone. “The federal employees running Project Lift are exploring a variety of solutions to modernize the FAA’s telecommunications network,” the spokesperson says. “Current contractors are part of the discussion.”

    The FAA did push back on the idea that DOGE is driving Project Lift. “DOGE is not spearheading anything at the FAA, nor are there any DOGE employees at FAA,” the agency spokesperson says. “Project Lift was conceived and is managed by federal employees.” 

    Speaking about the NDAs, the FAA spokesperson says: “Employees routinely sign non-disclosure agreements to avoid conflicts of interest.”

    It’s not clear what company or companies are benefiting from the project, which has not been publicly announced. “Only a few [staffers] know the exact details due to the NDAs,” the source says, adding that people “just know DOGE is involved and anything with this project is the highest priority.” 

    “The billion-dollar question is: Who is getting the funding to consolidate these programs, why the secrecy, and why is DOGE all over it?” they say.

    “Hedging your bets,” says the FAA worker, “Project Lift could be an opportunity for Starlink to add itself to the portfolio of network communications for the FAA.” They say there’s no guarantee that’s going to happen — at least “as of now.”

    The FAA worker offers another potential reason for DOGE’s involvement in the project, and its “accelerated” timeline: Amid a series of troubling air safety incidents and accidents — and public outcry about DOGE’s chaotic cuts — the DOGE team wants a win that they can sell people.

    Two other people with knowledge of the matter say that though details remain murky, it is widely assumed internally that this project could be a perfect vehicle for embedding Musk’s Starlink within the FAA’s operations — should the administration decide to shove more money into the Trump adviser’s business empire. 

    Responding to the idea that Project Lift could be an opportunity for Starlink, the FAA spokesperson says: “To update our telecommunications system, it will require multiple companies and multiple technologies — this is not a one-technology solution. That is why we are testing not only satellites, but also fiber and wireless to ensure the safety of the national airspace system.”

    Some FAA personnel have been implicitly threatened with having their lives ruined by potential criminal charges from the Trump Justice Department if they blab about Project Lift, according to a person familiar with the situation. Recently, when one FAA staffer was warned about leaking by a Musk-aligned superior, the staffer found the threat of prosecution laughable, given that none of the information they were aware of sounded classified, the person familiar with the situation adds. 

    Responding to the claims that FAA staffers have been threatened with criminal charges if they share details about Project Lift, the spokesperson only says, “As with any non-disclosure agreement across the federal government, employees must follow the rules of the agreement to ensure there is no conflict of interest.” 

    The level of secrecy from Musk and Trump allies about Project Lift has raised alarm within the FAA, which the second Trump administration hasn’t spared from its three-month campaign of fear, purging, loyalty pledges, and brazen corruption and abuses.

    Musk, who spent $290 million to elect Trump and Republicans last year before being selected to lead DOGE, has been serving as a temporary “special government employee,” rather than disclose his vast financial holdings and suffer through a confirmation process. He is expected to formally depart the administration soon, though he said Tuesday he expects to continue working with DOGE in some capacity for the rest of Trump’s term. 

    Trending Stories

    Indeed, few senior administration officials and others close to Trump who spoke to Rolling Stone expect Musk to stop his meddling.

    “It makes no difference, to me anyways, if Elon backs off or steps away or whatever soon,” says one of the sources with knowledge of Project Lift. “His guys are here [at the FAA] and staying, and they’ve been giving orders on this stuff.”

  • Vladimir Putin ‘is playing America as a patsy’

    Vladimir Putin ‘is playing America as a patsy’

    play

    Iowa’s Republican U.S. Sen. Chuck Grassley said Russian President Vladimir Putin “is playing America as a patsy” amid ceasefire negotiations with Ukraine, and he urged President Donald Trump to enact tough sanctions.

    “IVE SEEN ENOUGH KILLING OF INNOCENT UKRAINIAN women + children,” Grassley wrote on the social media website X April 25. “President Trump pls put the toughest of sanctions on Putin. U ought to c from clear evidence that he is playing America as a patsy.”

    Former Republican presidential candidate and UN Ambassador Nikki Haley, retweeted Grassley, adding “Amen!”

    Trump has been pushing for an end to the war between Russia and Ukraine.

    And he voiced rare frustration with Putin after Russia launched a barrage of missile and drones strikes on Ukraine’s capital Kyiv that killed at least eight people and injured more than 70 others this week.

    “I am not happy with the Russian strikes on KYIV,” Trump wrote in a post on his Truth Social platform on April 24. “Not necessary, and very bad timing. Vladimir, STOP! 5000 soldiers a week are dying. Lets get the Peace Deal DONE!”

    Grassley has previously criticized Putin and encouraged a peace deal with Ukraine.

    At an April 23 town hall in Northwood, a constituent asked Grassley about the number of people who have died in the war and how the U.S. should proceed.

    “I would put more sanctions on Russia right now,” Grassley said. “And if we don’t want to give more armaments (to Ukraine), we ought to at least have the Patriot missiles so they can protect themselves.”

    Des Moines Register reporter Sabine Martin and USA TODAY contributed to this report.

    Brianne Pfannenstiel is the chief politics reporter for the Des Moines Register. Reach her at bpfann@dmreg.com or 515-284-8244. Follow her on X at @brianneDMR.

  • Elon Musk defends political deepfakes on X in latest free speech battle

    Elon Musk defends political deepfakes on X in latest free speech battle

    © 2025 Fortune Media IP Limited. All Rights Reserved. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy | CA Notice at Collection and Privacy Notice | Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
    FORTUNE is a trademark of Fortune Media IP Limited, registered in the U.S. and other countries. FORTUNE may receive compensation for some links to products and services on this website. Offers may be subject to change without notice.

  • A Young Elon Musk Declared Himself ‘Reincarnation’ of Alexander the Great, New Book Reveals

    A Young Elon Musk Declared Himself ‘Reincarnation’ of Alexander the Great, New Book Reveals

    Elon Musk, as a yet-unproven entrepreneur in his mid-20s, declared himself the “reincarnation” of ancient Greek conqueror Alexander the Great, a new book on the billionaire has revealed.

    Musk, now 53, made the comment around 30 years ago to a partner at one of the firms that bankrolled his first start-up, Zip2, which aimed to bring the Yellow Pages online, Washington Post reporter Faiz Siddiqui writes in Hubris Maximus, published Tuesday.

    Derek Proudian, then at Mohr Davidow Ventures, recalled grabbing lunch with the young Musk to discuss how to make the company viable on a small scale.

    Musk, however, insisted that he think bigger: Zip2 was “going to be the biggest company ever,” Proudian recalled him saying.

    When Proudian tried to change the subject, Musk doubled down.

    “No—you don’t understand,” he said. “I’m the reincarnation of the spirit of Alexander the Great.”

    Elon Musk.
    Elon Musk, then an unproven start-up founder, declared himself the “reincarnation” of Alexander the Great. Paul Harris/Getty Images

    Incredulous, Proudian pushed back that he might not reach that level of success. Musk wasn’t willing to hear it.

    “I’ve got the samurai spirit,” he said. “I’d rather commit seppuku than fail.”

    In the ’90s, Proudian brushed off Musk’s words, saying that he didn’t “take it that seriously when he was a twenty-three-year-old entrepreneur who didn’t have two nickels to rub together.”

    But with Musk now a multibillionaire who holds President Donald Trump’s ear (while still operating with the haughtiness of a young man who compared himself to one of history’s great conquerors), Proudian said he’s worried.

    “I am really concerned because I know how smart this guy is and I know how much money he has and I know how ruthless he is, and it’s playing out in front of my own eyes,” he said.

    Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
    Musk now holds the president’s ear—but seems to bring a similar attitude to his work. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

    Musk did not immediately return a Daily Beast request for comment, sent to his lawyer, on the book’s claims.

    Siddiqui’s book charts the rise of the world’s richest man—from his relentless push to outdo competitors at Tesla to his chaotic takeover of Twitter—arriving at Musk’s current venture: making huge cuts to the federal government as the unelected chief of the Department of Government Efficiency.

    True to its title, the book is ripe with fresh insider accounts of the “technoking”’s arrogance.

    Ross Gerber, a former Tesla investor and one of the company’s biggest cheerleaders, told Siddiqui that Musk cannot stand being told what to do—even by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

    “He just basically has a complete disdain for any authority period,” said Gerber, whose relationship with Musk eventually soured. “I have a completely different opinion about the hubris of thumbing your nose at the people that could really hurt you.”

    Elon Musk.
    Musk’s former investors and employees at Tesla offered their first-hand accounts of his arrogance. FREDERIC J. BROWN/AFP via Getty Images

    A former Tesla software engineer, Nathan Murthy, recounted that Musk’s disregard for Covid health concerns and racial justice amid the George Floyd protests convinced him of his boss’s callousness.

    “We saw with definitive proof his true colors,” Murthy said. “I don’t know if he doesn’t want to empathize or if he feels he’s just too busy to empathize.”

    When Musk bought Twitter for $44 billion in 2022, Siddiqui writes that he had little time for the opinions of the company’s employees, who were often wary of him.

    When he did call up executives to meet with him in his makeshift 10th-floor office, the scene was often bizarre.

    One high-level exec recalled waiting for 90 minutes outside of Musk’s office. When he was finally allowed to enter, Musk was watching a YouTube video on his phone. There ensued an awkward 10 minutes of silence during which the executive waited for Musk to acknowledge his presence.

    He finally did, exchanging pleasantries and offering a brief update. Then he abruptly said “thank you,” shook the exec’s hand, and returned to YouTube.

    Elon Musk.
    Faiz Siddiqui, a reporter who has long covered Musk, offered his personal experience with the billionaire’s haughtiness. ROBIN LEGRAND/AFP via Getty Images

    Siddiqui, who has long covered Musk’s antics at Tesla and Twitter for the Post, also offered a look into his personal experience with the billionaire.

    Reached for comment on a story by Siddiqui, Musk would respond with slight variations of the same quip: “Give my regards to your puppetmaster,” ostensibly referring to the Post’s owner, fellow multibillionaire founder Jeff Bezos.

    The book also sheds light on the dynamic between Musk and Trump before the Department of Government Efficiency chief signed onto the president’s team.

    It offers an insider’s recollection of a meeting between Musk and Trump to discuss electric vehicles in 2020. In 2022, Trump, in a jab at Musk, claimed that he wielded the power in the discussion. “I could have said, ‘drop to your knees and beg,’ and he would have done it,” Trump boasted.

    Elon Musk and Donald Trump.
    The book challenges Trump’s account of a 2022 meeting between the president and Musk. Andrew Harnik/Getty Images

    Hubris Maximus paints a contrasting picture of the Oval Office encounter.

    Trump, eager to score a victory in his push to boost American manufacturing, declared himself a Tesla owner and urged Musk to build more factories in the U.S.

    Musk, however, was considering building a factory in Mexico or Canada. Trump asked him if there was anything the administration could do for him.

    Musk said that nothing immediately came to mind.