Blog

  • DeepMind UK staff seek to unionise and challenge defence deals and Israel links

    DeepMind UK staff seek to unionise and challenge defence deals and Israel links

    Unlock the Editor’s Digest for free

    Google DeepMind staff in the UK are seeking to unionise in an effort to challenge the company’s decision to sell its artificial intelligence technologies to defence groups and ties to the Israeli government.

    Around 300 London-based employees of the tech giant’s AI arm, which is led by British Nobel laureate Sir Demis Hassabis, have sought to join the Communication Workers Union in recent weeks, according to three people briefed on the move.

    The effort creates new strain on DeepMind which is being pushed by its corporate parent to find commercial uses for its powerful AI, with Hassabis suggesting recently that companies in democratic countries should work together to support national security. 

    The move to unionise follows growing discontent at the company after Google dropped a pledge in February not to develop AI technologies that “cause or are likely to cause overall harm”, including weapons and surveillance.

    Three people involved with the unionisation drive said media reports that Google is selling its cloud services and AI technology to the Israeli Ministry of Defence has also caused disquiet. The Israeli government has a $1.2bn cloud computing agreement with Google and Amazon, named Project Nimbus.

    Demis Hassabis
    Demis Hassabis, who leads the AI unit, suggests that companies in democratic countries should work together to support national security © TT News Agency/AFP/Getty Images

    Further tension was caused by media reports that the Israel Defense Forces have used AI systems to generate targets for assassinations and attacks in the Gaza strip, although it is unclear if the IDF is using commercially purchased software for those purposes, or building its own. The IDF did not reply to a request for comment.

    “We’re putting two and two together and think the technology we’re developing is being used in the conflict [in Gaza],” said one engineer involved in the unionisation effort. “This is basically cutting-edge AI that we’re providing to an ongoing conflict. People don’t want their work used like this.”

    “People feel duped,” the person added. 

    According to correspondence seen by the FT, five DeepMind staff have quit over the past two months citing the Israel cloud computing deal and Google’s reversal of existing commitments around the use of its AI. In the US, Google fired some staff for staging sit-in protests over Project Nimbus.

    In May 2024, DeepMind staff sent a letter to the company’s leadership calling on it to drop its military contracts, and have held some meetings with management, but their requests have been denied.

    The effort to organise will now need to be recognised by the company, through a vote among DeepMind employees in the UK. The AI unit has around 2,000 staff in the UK.

    A spokesperson for Google said: “Our approach is and has always been to develop and deploy AI responsibly. We encourage constructive and open dialogue with all of our employees. In the UK and around the world, Googlers have long been part of employee representative groups, works councils and unions.”

    The company said it still complies with its AI principles for responsible development, but that the landscape has changed significantly since its 2018 pledge against AI weapons and surveillance.

    Unionisation remains relatively rare across the tech sector, which has long resisted attempts to organise its workforce. But there has been growing activity in recent years, including at Amazon and Apple. Google employees founded the Alphabet Workers Union in the US in 2021. 

    One person said that if the union gains recognition from DeepMind, it will seek to meet management to request that the company changes course on defence deals and, if unsuccessful, to consider strike action. They said that colleagues in the US were also in discussions about unionisation. 

    “What I hope and what people who are active are hoping is that we stay away from any military contracts,” they added. 

    Google has faced similar protests over its military ties before. In 2018, several staffers quit and thousands of employees signed a petition in protest against Project Maven, a contract for the US military that used AI technology to improve drone strikes. Following widespread staff discontent, Google did not renew its contract with the Pentagon and pledged not to work on AI technologies for weapons or surveillance. 

    One senior figure in the CWU union who is not a DeepMind employee said that when the company was first founded it “attracted lots of smart people that wanted to work on things for genuine good”, but that Google had started “chasing military money”. Google bought the company in 2014.

    They noted that staff at DeepMind are often on high salaries. “They’re not joining the trade union for pay negotiations. They’ve joined because they’ve seen the benefits of collectivising to hold Google to account for their stated ethics,” they said.

    The engineer at DeepMind who has joined the CWU and is involved in organising discontented staff, said that “joining a union is probably the craziest thing a lot of DeepMinders would have ever thought they’d do” but “people’s level of discomfort has slowly risen over the past few years”.

    The company is “sacrificing morals for greed”, the employee added.  

  • Ranked: The Top 10 Most Wanted Skills for AI Jobs

    Ranked: The Top 10 Most Wanted Skills for AI Jobs

    Ranked: The Top 10 Most Wanted Skills for AI Jobs

    More than ever, AI jobs are becoming increasingly sought after. We show the top skills listed in job postings in a rapidly expanding field.
  • Shedeur Sanders, Browns dominate Round 1

    Shedeur Sanders, Browns dominate Round 1

    play

    Editor’s note: Follow 2025 NFL draft live updates, grades and analysis.

    The 2025 NFL draft is a long way from completion – 225 picks yet to be made over the next two days in Rounds 2 through 7.

    But a tone was certainly set in Thursday night’s first round, which was chalk for exactly one pick before the Jacksonville Jaguars tossed a grenade into all of those carefully (and not so carefully) crafted mock drafts by trading up to the second spot. Plenty of surprises from that point forward – which, said another way, means several (premature?) winners and losers in the context of Round 1. (May the “losers” see their fortunes change over the coming days and weeks):

    LOSERS

    Shedeur Sanders

    Like it or not, he remains the headliner of this draft – even as he continues waiting to get picked on that brutal NFL playground. Sanders and his father, Hall of Famer and University of Colorado head coach Deion Sanders, watched from their Texas home … only to realize the Big 12’s 2024 Offensive Player of the Year will have to wait 24 more hours – bound to bring another brutal news cycle – before he finds a professional home. Was Shedeur Sanders unfairly maligned? Is he eating deserved humble pie? Is he merely being slotted where his abilities appropriately merit? All matters for debate – and they will doubtless be parsed. Hopefully for Sanders, his fire is stoked, Friday’s wait is short, and his next team truly provides an optimal opportunity to eventually silence a growing legion of naysayers and haters.

    Cam Ward

    Good for him, appropriated with the No. 1 pick by the Tennessee Titans, an outcome largely expected over the past two months. But with the draft’s glaring spotlight trained on Sanders, hard to remember when a quarterback drafted in the top spot seemed so incidental. Maybe it’s because there was so little drama regarding Ward’s fate. Maybe it’s because the Titans don’t exactly have a national following. Maybe it’s because Ward likely would have been the sixth or seventh QB taken had he remained in last year’s draft, which he initially declared for. Whatever the case, Ward will have his day and certainly the platform to prove he was the marquee passer, if not player, to enter the league in 2025.

    Draft-eligible offensive backfield

    Just two quarterbacks (Ward and Jaxson Dart) were picked Thursday despite all the airtime and ink, whether real or digital, devoted to the highest profile of positions. Moreover, only two running backs (Ashton Jeanty, Omarion Hampton) were chosen from a deep and seemingly impactful group at the position.

    Draft-eligible defensive backfield

    Three-and-a-half defensive backs (Travis Hunter, Jahdae Barron, Maxwell Hairston, Malaki Starks) were called in Round 1 – kinda light given how many teams are primarily in nickel and dime packages (5-6 DBs on field) and the continuing proliferation of the position. It was especially surprising given Michigan CB Will Johnson and South Carolina S Nick Emmanwori were among those who dropped, though Johnson’s knee has apparently scuttled his stock. But expect a run early Friday, especially with the likes of Ole Miss CB Trey Amos, East Carolina CB Shavon Revel Jr., Florida State CB Azareye’h Thomas and Notre Dame’s Benjamin Morrison and Xavier Watts still on the board.

    Clay Matthews

    Really, dude? Amid all the jobs lost, depressed stocks and ongoing chaos in the world, you had to bring political jokes to the stage Thursday when it’s eminently easy to play to a Wisconsin crowd by declaring any number of other ways that “the Bears still suck”? In this case, stick to sports.

    New England Patriots

    The run from quarterbacks likely cost them the opportunity to select Hunter or Penn State pass rusher Abdul Carter – widely regarded as the two most talented players in this draft. Still, the Pats likely got the guy they actually needed most in LSU LT Will Campbell, who was clearly moved by the opportunity he’ll have to keep QB Drake Maye from being drawn and quartered in 2025.

    Abdul Carter

    Buddy … it’s nice that you’re renouncing your Eagles fandom and embracing your new employer, the archrival New York Giants. But suggesting the No. 56 worn by Lawrence Taylor, arguably the greatest pass rusher (and maybe defensive player) ever, should come out of the rafters so you can wear it might not play well – with LT or this fan base. You’re not worthy, Mr. Carter, no matter how good you think you are.

    TO BE DETERMINED

    Cleveland Browns

    In the aftermath of the disastrous Deshaun Watson trade, they celebrated their first pick inside the top 50 in four years … by trading it to the Jaguars. Jacksonville snatched up Hunter – a sublime two-way threat that Cleveland GM Andrew Berry spoke glowingly of last week, though perhaps that was by shrewd design. The Browns instead took Michigan DT Mason Graham with the fifth pick, a selection that won’t catalyze the fan base the way Hunter would have … though Wolverines have recently found it pretty easy to win in Ohio, so nicely done, Mr. Berry. But any verdict will have to wait until 2026, when it seems more likely Cleveland will use one or both of its first-rounders to obtain the franchise quarterback Watson never was. (And don’t forget, it’s still possible Kirk Cousins pops up here in the interim…)

    Dallas Cowboys

    So far, so good? Not sexy but taking O-linemen has served them well for years, and G Tyler Booker could legitimately be the next great one in Big D.

    WINNERS

    Abdul Carter

    The first pure defender chosen, going third overall, the LT wannabe will have the opportunity to showcase his personality in the New York market while playing on a defense with two very capable pass rushers, Pro Bowler Brian Burns and 2022 first-rounder Kayvon Thibodeaux. Expect Carter to have short odds as the 2025 Defensive Rookie of the Year.

    Brian Daboll and Joe Schoen

    Not only did the Giants’ embattled brain trust come away with Carter – the player they correctly chose with the No. 3 pick – they managed to get back into the first round for Dart at No. 25. The best part(s)? The Giants just got much better; Daboll, the coach, and Schoen, the GM, probably improved their job security; and Dart doesn’t have to be forced into the lineup prematurely with veteran QBs Russell Wilson and Jameis Winston available to serve as 2025 cannon fodder. This franchise might actually be back on track.

    Super Bowl 59 winners

    Philadelphia Eagles EVP/GM Howie Roseman strikes again, somehow adding another SEC game wrecker (Alabama LB Jihaad Campbell in this case) precisely at plural positions (edge, off-ball linebacker) of need in Philly following issues created by free agency, Brandon Graham’s retirement and injuries.

    Super Bowl 59 losers

    If not for blocking issues, the Kansas City Chiefs might have won five of the past six Super Bowls. But they appeared to enjoy a stroke of luck, too, talented Ohio State LT Josh Simmons only slipping to them because he tore a patellar tendon last October. The injury might cost him some money in the near term, but being QB Patrick Mahomes’ bodyguard in the long term could pay off very handsomely for Simmons and the league’s only active dynasty.

    Travis Hunter

    The Jags clearly made a strong commitment to get Hunter, who, while rocking his pink blazer, seemed to be having the time of his life Thursday. Now he heads to a rebooting operation where he doesn’t have to be WR1 or CB1 and has a reasonable chance to make strong contributions offensively and defensively – and in a sad division where his presence could very much spark a turnaround in Duval County (or however new HC Liam Coen says it).

    Packers fans

    They were out in force for the first draft in the Cheese State in more than 80 years. They booed the Bears, while being respectful of recently passed Chicago Hall of Famer Steve McMichael. Finally, they were gift wrapped a first-round wideout, Texas’ speedy Matthew Golden, for the first time in 23 years. On Wisconsin!

    Aaron Rodgers

    Assuming he signs with the Pittsburgh Steelers … it appears he won’t have to compete with Sanders … barring what would likely be a costly trade to come up for him given Pittsburgh has no second-round pick. Assuming he can still whip Mason Rudolph, it appears Rodgers has a clear runway to the Steel City QB1 job.

    All NFL news on and off the field. Sign up for USA TODAY’s 4th and Monday newsletter.

  • Woman says ChatGPT saved her life. More in the Fox News AI Newsletter.

    Woman says ChatGPT saved her life. More in the Fox News AI Newsletter.

    Welcome to Fox News’ Artificial Intelligence newsletter with the latest AI technology advancements.

    IN TODAY’S NEWSLETTER:

    – Woman says ChatGPT saved her life by helping detect cancer, which doctors missed
    – Tesla launches test run for FSD Supervised, an AI-powered ride hailing service
    – China’s AI DeepSeek faces House probe over US data harvesting, CCP propaganda

    Lauren Bannon

    Lauren Bannon says ChatGPT helped diagnose her with cancer. (Kennedy News and Media)

    ‘LUCKY TO BE ALIVE’: A mother of two credits ChatGPT for saving her life, claiming the artificial intelligence chatbot flagged the condition leading to her cancer when doctors missed it.

    AUTONOMY TEST RUN: Robotaxis are closer to becoming a reality, after Tesla launched a full self-driving (FSD) supervised ride-hailing service in Austin, Texas, and the San Francisco Bay Area “for an early set of employees.”

    Elon Musk unveils Tesla's Robovan, Robotaxis, humanoid robots

    Robotaxi.  (Kurt “CyberGuy” Knutsson)

    HARVESTING YOUR DATA?: A powerful House Committee is demanding information from DeepSeek on what U.S. data it used to train the AI model as members accuse the company of being in the pocket of the Chinese government.

    DeepSeek

    DeepSeek (Reuters/Dado Ruvic/Illustration)

    EDUCATION REFORMS: President Donald Trump signed multiple Executive Orders relating to education Wednesday afternoon, with several tied to the theme of returning meritocracy back to the education system.

    WORTH THE RISKS?: If you haven’t heard the buzz about Manus yet, it’s the new AI model unveiled by a Singapore-based company called Butterfly Effect. This isn’t just another chatbot. It’s one of the first truly autonomous AI agents, able to do its own research, make decisions and even carry out plans, all with barely any human oversight.

    Subscribe now to get the Fox News Artificial Intelligence Newsletter in your inbox.

    FOLLOW FOX NEWS ON SOCIAL MEDIA

    Facebook
    Instagram
    YouTube
    Twitter
    LinkedIn

    SIGN UP FOR OUR OTHER NEWSLETTERS

    Fox News First
    Fox News Opinion
    Fox News Lifestyle
    Fox News Health

    DOWNLOAD OUR APPS

    Fox News
    Fox Business
    Fox Weather
    Fox Sports
    Tubi

    WATCH FOX NEWS ONLINE

    Fox News Go

    STREAM FOX NATION

    Fox Nation

    Stay up to date on the latest AI technology advancements and learn about the challenges and opportunities AI presents now and for the future with Fox News here.

  • Are they coming to your state?

    Are they coming to your state?

    play

    WASHINGTON – Dozens of states across the country are considering their own versions of a federal voting bill critics say could disenfranchise millions of Americans, including many married women.

    Republican lawmakers in 24 states introduced measures requiring people to prove their citizenship, using documents such as birth certificates or passports, when they register to vote, according to the nonpartisan Voting Rights Lab. Three other states – Louisiana, New Hampshire and Wyoming – have enacted similar laws in recent months. 

    Supporters call the efforts a security measure and say they’re trying to reinforce laws barring noncitizens from voting. But voting rights advocates argue it’s already exceedingly rare for noncitizens to vote – and the laws could make it more difficult for millions of Americans to cast a ballot.

    Opponents are particularly concerned the requirements will hit rural communities, military personnel and married women. About 83% of married women changed their name, and for many that means their birth certificates don’t match their current ID.

    In Washington, legislation dubbed the Safeguard American Voter Eligibility (SAVE) Act passed the House of Representatives in early April, but it faces an uphill battle in the closely divided Senate.

    The SAVE Act and the state legislation across the country all have slightly different requirements when it comes to what documents could be used to prove citizenship. Here’s what to know.

    States with existing rules  

    New Hampshire 

    New Hampshire in March held its first elections since it implemented a new voter registration law last year that’s stricter about what ID you can use. It’s among the only states where such a law has been in effect during an election season.  

    More than 95 people were turned away from voting in town elections due to the new documentation law, according to research from the New Hampshire Campaign for Voting Rights, a subsidiary of the progressive group America Votes.

    Other residents said they struggled to register to vote and cast a ballot in the March 11 local election because of the law.  

    Betsy Spencer, a 70-year-old resident of Hopkinton, New Hampshire, told New Hampshire Public Radio she was prepared with multiple documents when she showed up to vote but was initially turned away because she didn’t have her married name on her birth certificate.  

    Her situation is among the key concerns voting rights groups have about proof of citizenship laws.

    Married women who changed their last name may be required to bring extra documentation, such as a marriage license, to prove their citizenship in New Hampshire and other states that enact similar laws.  

    The New Hampshire Secretary of State’s office declined to comment on the legislation when reached for this story.

    Arizona 

    Arizona voters are already required to prove their citizenship to vote in state and local races. In fact, the SAVE Act mirrors laws on the books in the Grand Canyon State, the Arizona Republic, part of the USA TODAY Network, reported.

    Voters in the state aren’t required to do the same in federal contests because the National Voter Registration Act of 1993 blocks most states from confirming citizenship in national elections. New Hampshire, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Idaho, Wyoming and North Dakota are the only states exempt from that rule.  

    Wyoming 

    Wyoming passed its law based on the SAVE Act on March 21. Starting July 1, the state will require residents to provide one of several documents to prove their citizenship status, including a driver’s license indicating citizenship, a U.S. passport, a birth certificate, military draft records, a tribal identification card or a certificate of citizenship. 

    Wyoming Secretary of State Chuck Gray described it as “commonsense election integrity legislation,” in a statement after its passage.

    Five states – Michigan, Minnesota, New York, Vermont and Washington – currently have enhanced driver’s licenses that can serve as proof of citizenship, according to the Department of Homeland Security. Wyoming is considering legislation that would require U.S. immigrants in the country with the proper documentation to have a demarcation on their state-issued ID stating they are “not a United States citizen,” but it’s not yet law.

    Louisiana 

    Louisiana’s law went into effect Jan. 1 requiring proof of citizenship to register to vote, but the state hasn’t issued guidance on what documentation residents need. It’s not yet clear how it will handle citizenship requirements for federal elections.  

    States to watch 

    Texas  

    One of the strictest proof of citizenship bills in the country is quickly moving through the Texas legislature. The state’s Senate approved the proposal, which is modeled after Arizona’s law, on April 1. The bill needs the approval of the state House and the signature of the state’s Republican governor to become law. 

    Texas’ legislation would retroactively apply to people already registered to vote, not just new voters. If it’s enacted, voters would need to provide proof of citizenship to participate in presidential elections and state and local races, though some of the requirements are likely to be challenged in court.  

    “Texas, in addition to being the second most populous state in the country, it is also one of the states that’s really fast-tracked documented proof of citizenship legislation following Trump’s executive order,” said Liz Avore, a senior policy advisor at the Voting Rights Lab.

    President Donald Trump signed an executive order earlier this year establishing new national voter identification requirements. A federal judge on April 24 temporarily blocked the policy from going into effect after multiple groups sued the administration alleging that it lacked the power to issue the order.

    An analysis from the Voting Rights lab of U.S. State Department data found that more than 12 million of the roughly 31 million people living in Texas do not have a passport, one of the main forms of citizenship documentation, Avore said. That’s close to 40% of the state population.  

    Michigan  

    GOP state lawmakers in Michigan are pushing for a constitutional amendment that would require those registering to vote to provide proof of citizenship. Michigan is among the few states where drivers’ licenses could fulfill this requirement.  

    The amendment proposal passed a state House committee but has yet to be taken up for a floor vote in the chamber. It’s likely to face tough odds in the Democratic-led state Senate.

    Supporters of the constitutional amendment have also launched a separate ballot initiative effort. The state’s election board recently cleared the way for organizers to begin collecting the hundreds of thousands of signatures they would need to put the amendment up for a vote in 2026.

    Still, GOP state Rep. Bryan Posthumus, who represents the area north of Grand Rapids, Michigan, and introduced the voter ID measure, told USA TODAY April 22 getting it on the ballot will be a “steep hill to climb.” 

    Missouri 

    A Missouri bill along the lines of efforts in Michigan and other states passed out of a state Senate committee at the beginning of March but has yet to be taken up for a vote.  

    The author of the legislation, state Sen. Ben Brown, said the proposal could be tacked on as an amendment to other election-related bills this session. But he said it is “getting pretty late” in the current legislative calendar to take action: It’s not impossible for it to pass in the coming months, but it is becoming increasingly unlikely.  

    States that have introduced legislation 

    Legislators in more than a dozen states, including Democratic strongholds, have introduced bills that mirror the SAVE Act. Many are in the early stages of consideration, including:  

  • Amazon, Nvidia say all options on the table to power AI including fossil fuels

    Amazon, Nvidia say all options on the table to power AI including fossil fuels

    Anton Petrus | Moment | Getty Images

    OKLAHOMA CITY — Amazon and Nvidia told a room of oil and gas executives this week that all options are on the table to power artificial intelligence including fossil fuels such as natural gas.

    The tech and energy industries gathered in Oklahoma City at the Hamm Institute for American Energy to discuss how the U.S. can meet the growing energy needs for AI data centers

    The Big Tech companies have invested mostly in renewable power in an effort to slash their carbon dioxide emissions, but they are now navigating a changed political environment. President Donald Trump has ditched U.S. commitments to fight climate change as he seeks to increase fossil fuel production, particularly natural gas.

    There is now growing public acknowledgment from the tech industry that gas will be needed, at least in the near term, to help fuel AI.

    “To have the energy we need for the grid, it’s going to take an all of the above approach for a period of time,” Kevin Miller, Amazon’s vice president of global data centers, said during a panel discussion Thursday. “We’re not surprised by the fact that we’re going to need to add some thermal generation to meet the needs in the short term.”

    Amazon remains focused on slashing its carbon emissions, Miller said. It is the largest corporate purchaser of renewable energy and is investing in advanced nuclear and carbon capture technology to reduce the environmental impact of its energy consumption, the executive said.

    But those advanced technologies will not come online until the 2030s and Amazon needs steady and secure power now, Miller said.

    “We’re very explicit that meeting customers’ demands for capacity is first and foremost in our priority list, and so having access to power is first and foremost what we focus on,” Miller said. “And we have a goal to be net-zero carbon as a company by 2040 and are very focused on that.”

    Nvidia is also focused on environmental impact but wants “all options on the table” as AI faces an energy crunch, said Josh Parker, the chipmaker’s senior director of corporate sustainability.

    “At the end of the day, we need power. We just need power,” Parker said at the panel. “We have some customers who really prioritize the clean energy, and some customers who don’t care as much,” the executive said.

    Anthropic co-founder Jack Clark called for data center developers to be realistic about the energy sources that are currently available. Anthropic estimates that 50 gigawatts of new power is needed by 2027, equivalent to about 50 nuclear reactors. AI demand can help drive the development of “new and novel sources” of power over the longer term, he said.

    The idea of using coal, however, was met with unease. Trump recently signed an order that aims to boost coal production, citing demand from AI. The Amazon and Nvidia executives did not answer directly when asked during the panel whether they thought coal had a role play in powering AI.

    “You have a broader set of options than just coal,” Clark said. “We would certainly consider it, but I don’t think I’d say it’s at the top of our list.”

    Catch up on the latest energy news from CNBC Pro:

  • Have Shein, Temu prices gone up? Here’s what we found

    Have Shein, Temu prices gone up? Here’s what we found

    play

    Fast fashion fans who forgot to clear their shopping carts may have a higher total waiting if they return to checkout after Friday, April 25.

    E-commerce giants Shein and Temu announced in early April that prices would be rising on both platforms in response to changing trade policy between the U.S. and China. In nearly identical notices shared April 16, the competitors explained that, “Due to recent changes in global trade rules and tariffs,” operating expenses had gone up and so would prices.

    “To keep offering the products you love without compromising on quality, we will be making price adjustments starting April 25, 2025,” both notices read.

    Known for selling clothing and convenience items at cheap prices, both sellers have attracted American shoppers looking to place large orders for remarkably low costs and often free shipping. Between the 145% import tariff currently imposed on China by President Donald Trump and the impending closure of a trade loophole that allowed packages under $800 in value to come into the country for free, those rock-bottom prices may soon begin to rise.

    We tracked 15 items across both platforms in the days before the April 25 deadline and after to get a snapshot of what the price changes may look like. Here’s what we found.

    Why are Shein and Temu prices going up?

    Shein and Temu are Chinese-founded companies. Though Shein has since moved its base to Singapore and Temu has a headquarters in Boston, both still operate and ship items out of China, meaning they will be subject to the 145% import tariff currently levied against the country.

    Additionally, a trade loophole called the “de minimis” exemption that previously allowed low-value goods to be shipped to the U.S. duty-free is set to close at midnight on May 1.

    Beginning on May 2, carriers (meaning commercial mail agencies like UPS and FedEx) will either have to pay a 120% rate on packages from China valued at under $800 or a $100 package fee. On June 1, that fee will jump from $100 to $200, the White House announced on April 9.

    When are Shein and Temu prices going up?

    While the de minimis exemption is not being eliminated until May 2, both Shein and Temu released notices on April 16 saying they would be performing “price adjustments” starting April 25.

    Though the two companies are competitors, their announcements were nearly identical.

    Are Shein and Temu still shipping to the U.S.?

    Yes, Shein and Temu are still shipping to the U.S. and other countries. Because of tariffs and the closing de minimis loophole, however, U.S. customers may see higher prices.

    How much will Shein and Temu raise their prices?

    Neither Shein nor Temu clarified how much they intend to raise prices. When reviewing dozens of items on both sites, USA TODAY found that some prices were over 100% higher, while some were the same or lower than their pre-April 25 tag. The 15 items below are a sampling of what USA TODAY tracked.

    Because Temu and Shein serve as a marketplace for third-party sellers, have partnerships with certain manufacturers and make some of their own branded clothing, a clean, uniform increase across all items, categories and sellers is likely not possible.

    See price changes on 10 Temu items

    Temu has a “Local Warehouse” shopping tab under which you can shop items that ship through nearby distributors. Temu, like Shein, has fulfillment centers and warehouses in different countries, including the U.S., where Chinese sellers and manufacturers send some items in bulk.

    Through this practice, Temu can offer faster, cheaper shipping to U.S. customers and, in the case of the new tariffs and duties, avoid foisting additional costs onto customers. This is reflected in the price changes we observed on April 25, which disproportionately impacted non-local inventory.

    We chose popular items from housewares as well as men’s, women’s and children’s clothing categories on the “best-selling” pages on Temu.

    Locally shipped

    Non-local warehouse

    See price changes on 5 Shein items

    While Shein also has U.S.-based fulfillment centers, it does not specify when shopping where an item is shipped from. When putting items in a shopping cart on April 25, a new message appeared at the top saying, “Tariffs are included in the price you pay. You’ll never have to pay extra at delivery.”

    We chose housewares and clothing items from “most popular items” under the “best sellers” category on Shein. The prices of items we reviewed did not appear to change significantly, though it is unclear if this is because the items selected come from shippers closer to the U.S. or our sample did not capture the most impacted products.

    Will Shein and Temu prices keep going up?

    Both Shein and Temu said in their online statements that they would be making adjustments “starting” on April 25, indicating that price changes will be an ongoing process. However, neither company responded to USA TODAY’s request for clarification.

    Trump said in late April that the 145% tariff on China will “come down substantially” in the future. It is unclear how this could impact prices.

    Contributing: Bianca Harris, James Sergent, USA TODAY

  • AI Enhances Detection of Child Abuse Cases

    AI Enhances Detection of Child Abuse Cases

    Summary: A new study found that artificial intelligence can better identify instances of physical child abuse in emergency rooms compared to traditional diagnostic coding methods. Researchers developed a machine-learning model that more accurately estimated abuse prevalence based on high-risk injuries and physical abuse indicators.

    The AI approach outperformed methods relying solely on diagnostic codes, which misdiagnosed about 8.5% of cases. These findings suggest that AI could significantly improve early detection and treatment of child abuse, leading to better protection for vulnerable children.

    Key Facts:

    • Improved Accuracy: Traditional coding methods missed an average of 8.5% of child abuse cases.
    • AI Advantage: Machine learning models provided a more accurate picture of child abuse trends in emergency departments.
    • Vulnerable Population: The study focused on 3,317 cases involving children under 10, with most under age 2.

    Source: Pediatric Academic Societies

    Artificial intelligence (AI) can help better identify prevalence of physical abuse of children seen in the emergency room, a new study found.

    The research will be presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) 2025 Meeting, held April 24-28 in Honolulu. 

    AI Enhances Detection of Child Abuse Cases
    Relying on abuse codes alone misdiagnosed on average 8.5% of cases. Credit: Neuroscience News

    Researchers used a machine-learning model to estimate instances of child abuse seen in emergency departments based on diagnostic codes for high-risk injury and physical abuse.

    The researchers’ approach better predicted abuse rates than those that rely solely on diagnostic codes entered by a provider or administrative staff. Relying on abuse codes alone misdiagnosed on average 8.5% of cases.

    “Our AI approach offers a clearer look at trends in child abuse, which helps providers more appropriately treat abuse and improve child safety,” said Farah Brink, MD, child abuse pediatrician at Nationwide Children’s Hospital, and assistant professor at The Ohio State University.

    “AI-powered tools hold tremendous potential to revolutionize how researchers understand and work with data on sensitive issues, including child abuse.”

    Researchers studied data from 3,317 injury and abuse-related emergency department visits at seven children’s hospitals between February 2021 and December 2022. All children were under the age of 10 and nearly three quarters were under the age of two.

    About this AI and child abuse research news

    Author: PAS 2025
    Source: Pediatric Academic Societies
    Contact: PAS 2025 – Pediatric Academic Societies
    Image: The image is credited to Neuroscience News

    Original Research: The findings will be presented at the Pediatric Academic Societies (PAS) 2025 Meeting


    Abstract

    A Machine Learning Approach to Improve Estimation of Physical Abuse

    Background

    International Classification of Diseases, 10th Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-10-CM) codes are inaccurate for determining child physical abuse (PA) prevalence, particularly in emergency department (ED) settings. Consideration of injury codes along with abuse-specific codes may enable more accurate PA prevalence estimates.

    Objective

    To develop a coding schema to better estimate PA using machine learning.

    Design/Methods

    We performed a secondary data analysis of children < 10 years evaluated by a child abuse pediatrician (CAP) due to concerns for PA during Feb 2021-Dec 2022 at 7 children’s hospitals contributing data to both CAPNET, a multicenter child abuse research network, and Pediatric Health Information System (PHIS). We excluded encounters not linked with PHIS and those not evaluated in the ED during the CAPNET encounter.

    True PA was defined by CAP assigned rating 5- 7 on a 7-point scale of PA likelihood within the CAPNET database. Abuse-specific codes, including suspected codes, were defined as ICD-10-CM codes for PA modified from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention child abuse and neglect syndromic surveillance definition. All 4-digit injury ICD-10-CM codes were used.

    We developed LASSO logistic regression models to predict CAP¬ determined PA for encounters with and without abuse-specific codes and used the models to calculate site-specific estimates of PA prevalence. We calculated the estimation error for site estimates based on 1) abuse-specific codes alone and 2) our LASSO predictive models. Estimation error was defined as estimated PA prevalence minus CAP-determined PA prevalence (true value).

    Results

    3317 of 6178 CAPNET encounters were successfully linked with PHIS and seen in the ED. Median age was 8.4 months with 74% < 2 years and 59% < 1 year. CAP diagnosed PA in 35% (n=l145) of all encounters, 12.7% (n=240) of encounters without abuse-specific codes, and 63.4% (n=905) of encounters with abuse-specific codes.

    At least one abuse-specific code was assigned for 43% of encounters. Site-specific estimates of PA prevalence based only on assignment of abuse-specific codes overestimated prevalence with estimation errors ranging from 2.0% to 14.3% (average absolute error 8.5%).

    Estimates of site-specific PA prevalence based on our predictive models had reduced errors from -3.0% to 2.6% (average absolute error 1.8%) (Fig. 1). Absolute error decreased for 6 of 7 sites and increased by 0.6% for the remaining site (Fig. 2).

    Conclusion(s)

    Our predictive models more accurately estimated the prevalence of PA compared to abuse-specific codes alone.

  • Prosecution of Wisconsin judge underscores Trump administration’s aggressive approach to immigration enforcement

    Prosecution of Wisconsin judge underscores Trump administration’s aggressive approach to immigration enforcement



    CNN
     — 

    The arrest of a Wisconsin state judge for allegedly helping an undocumented immigrant avoid arrest has opened a new front in the Trump administration’s aggressive attempt to carry out a historic deportation campaign.

    The decision by the Justice Department to charge Milwaukee County Circuit Judge Hannah Dugan for obstruction and concealing the individual from arrest turned a spotlight on the administration’s decision to exercise immigration enforcement in certain places that have in the past been mostly off-limits to such federal activity, including courthouses, schools and places of worship.

    Her arrest Friday morning immediately drew intense criticism from legal experts and Democratic lawmakers, who widely viewed it as the Trump administration’s latest bid to strong-arm courts around the country as it pushes ahead with controversial immigration policies.

    “Pure intimidation – nothing more than that,” said retired federal Judge Nancy Gertner.

    The Justice Department has repeatedly asserted that it will investigate any local officials who do not assist federal authorities on immigration matters. Earlier this year, President Donald Trump revived a policy from his first term that allows federal officials to make immigration-related arrests in courts.

    But as in so-called sanctuary cities around the US, court officials are not obligated to work with federal officials in such arrests if the warrant being executed is an administrative warrant and not a judicial one.

    Such was the case for Eduardo Flores-Ruiz, who federal officials were attempting to arrest on April 18, the day he was appearing before Dugan in a criminal matter. After learning that the officials were in possession of an administrative warrant for Flores-Ruiz, the judge allegedly helped him and his attorney leave through a nonpublic area of the courthouse. Flores-Ruiz was arrested by federal agents shortly thereafter.

    “Without a (judicial) warrant, there obviously would literally be no obligation for her to cooperate. It would only happen if there was a warrant,” Jeff Swartz, a former Florida state judge, told CNN’s Brianna Keilar on “CNN News Central.” “She has no obligation to assist at all with the apprehension of that particular defendant in a civil matter.”

    Former federal prosecutor Elie Honig said that it’s likely Dugan wouldn’t be facing the federal charges had she only declined to cooperate with the agents that day.

    For her conduct to result in the charges she’s facing, he said, “there needs to be some affirmative act taken. And here, showing this person the back door, giving this person access to the back door, and then ushering the person out the back door would be an affirmative act.”

    But Honig, a CNN legal analyst, stressed that prosecutors have to take into account a host of factors when deciding whether bringing obstruction charges are “appropriate and necessary.”

    In this case, he said, there are legitimate questions about whether pursuing charges against Dugan could represent prosecutorial overreach.

    Dugan’s attorney, Steven Biskupic, said in a statement later Friday that his client “has committed herself to the rule of law and the principles of due process for her entire career as a lawyer and a judge.”

    “Judge Dugan will defend herself vigorously, and looks forward to being exonerated,” he added.

    Dugan’s arrest is not the first time the Justice Department under Trump has accused a sitting judge of helping an undocumented immigrant evade an immigration officer.

    In 2019, a Massachusetts state judge was indicted on obstruction of justice and other federal charges, which were later dropped during the Biden administration.

    “I think the canary in the coal mine was the Shelley Joseph case in Massachusetts, Gertner said.

    She and other experts CNN spoke with said the way that case was handled was much more measured than how the Justice Department has handled Dugan’s, underscoring the political nature of the new matter.

    Gertner, for example, emphasized the fact that Dugan was arrested for a white-collar offense, while the Massachusetts judge – Shelley Richmond Joseph – was not taken into custody.

    “I can’t emphasize enough how preposterous that is,” Gertner said. “This is not an individual who’s going to flee. This is not an individual who’s a threat to the community.”

    The experts also pointed to the public statements Trump administration officials made touting Dugan’s case as evidence of their intention to use her prosecution for political ends.

    Among those officials are Attorney General Pam Bondi, who said in an interview on Fox News after the arrest was executed that “if you are destroying evidence and you are obstructing justice, when you have victims sitting in a courtroom of domestic violence and you are escorting a criminal defendant out the back door, it will not be tolerated.”

    “I think some of these judges think they are beyond and above the law, and they are not,” Bondi added.

    Doug Keith, who serves as senior counsel at the Brennan Center for Justice’s Judiciary Program, said it’s possible that more dramatic episodes could arise as the Trump administration continues seeking widespread cooperation in its deportation campaign.

    “Unfortunately, I don’t think this is the last conflict we will see like this,” Keith said.

    “The policy change that ICE made around courthouse arrests on January 21 has created these circumstances in which we should expect to see chaos like this play out in more courthouses across the country,” he added.

    CNN’s Hannah Rabinowitz and Michael Williams contributed to this report.

  • National Science Foundation cancels hundreds of grants amid DOGE cuts

    National Science Foundation cancels hundreds of grants amid DOGE cuts

    play

    WASHINGTON – Approximately 700 scientific research projects funded through the National Science Foundation were canceled on April 25 amid scrutiny from President Donald Trump‘s Department of Government Efficiency.

    It came the day after the agency’s director, Sethuraman Panchanathan, abruptly resigned from his position, and a week after the agency cut another 400 grants touted by the Department of Government Efficiency as “wasteful DEI” funding. Panchanathan was appointed to the lead the agency that funds non-medical scientific research during Trump’s first term.

    Several of the canceled grants align with a 2024 report published by Texas Sen. Ted Cruz identifying projects he argued had been “politicized,” according to a public list of canceled grants maintained by researchers at science nonprofit rOpenSci and Harvard University.

    Among those were projects to develop an after-school program for “rural, Latinx youth” and to study online STEM learning by girls.

    It also cut grants that were not included in Cruz’s report, like ones that would build a program for computer science students at Historically Black Colleges and Universities (HBCUs), to make scientific conferences more accessible for people in rural areas or at small institutions, or to create a tool to identify deepfakes created by artificial intelligence.

    Last week, DOGE staffers showed up at the NSF headquarters in Alexandria, Virginia, multiple NSF employees told USA TODAY.

    A few days later, the agency announced it would adjust its priorities to eliminate awards “with more narrow impact limited to subgroups of people based on protected class or characteristics,” including those related to “diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) and misinformation/disinformation.”

    The same day, it announced more than 400 grants would be eliminated.

    On April 25, NSF sent out an additional memo to staff announcing a pause in “supplemental awards,” according to a copy of the memo obtained by USA TODAY, which provide additional funding to projects in the case of unforeseen expenses.

    The administration reportedly told agency leaders that Trump would be seeking a 55% cut to the agency’s budget and the elimination of half of its staff.

    Another memo sent to staff on April 24 and reviewed by USA TODAY offered a new deferred resignation program and warned that the agency “may be expected to make significant workforce reductions.”

    The rapid changes have surprised and destabilized staff at the agency, which funds basic scientific research that can become the foundation for widely used technology like artificial intelligence, 3D printing, LASIK eye surgery, MRIs, and semiconductors.

    One NSF employee granted anonymity to discuss changes at the agency said they are worried that the elimination of grants could jeopardize the United States’ position as a global scientific leader amid intense competition with China.

    The NSF did not respond to a request for comment. DOGE praised the changes in a post on X as “great work.”

    The DOGE efforts to slash “waste and fraud” from the federal government, led by Trump ally Elon Musk, has swept through multiple agencies since Trump returned to office in January, eliminating contracts and leases and, in some cases, all but eliminated entire agencies.

    Musk claims the project has saved $160 billion to date as he prepares to step away from the administration. As recently as late March, Musk claimed he would save $1 trillion.