Deng, M. & Guo, Y. A study of safety acceptance and behavioral interventions for autonomous driving technologies. Sci. Rep. 12, 17891. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-022-22720-0 (2022).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Khan, S. K., Shiwakoti, N., Stasinopoulos, P. & Warren, M. A multinational empirical study of perceived cyber barriers to automated vehicles deployment. Sci. Rep. 13, 1842. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-29018-9 (2023).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Yang, X. J. & Robert, L. P. Drivers’ age and automated vehicle explanations. Sustainability 13(4), 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13041948 (1948).
Article
Google Scholar
Schwarting, W., Pierson, A., Alonso-Mora, J., Karaman, S. & Rus, D. Social behavior for autonomous vehicles. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 116, 24972–24978 (2019).
Article
ADS
MathSciNet
PubMed
PubMed Central
MATH
Google Scholar
Jian, J.-Y., Bisantz, A. M. & Drury, C. G. Foundations for an empirically determined scale of trust in automated systems. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 4, 53–71 (2000).
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, J. D. & See, K. A. Trust in automation: Designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46, 50–80 (2004).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H. & Schoorman, F. D. An integrative model of organizational trust. Acad. Manag. Rev. 20, 709–734 (1995).
Article
Google Scholar
Makovi, K., Sargsyan, A., Li, W., Bonnefon, J.-F. & Rahwan, T. Trust within human-machine collectives depends on the perceived consensus about cooperative norms. Nat. Commun. 14, 3108. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-023-38592-5 (2023).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Du, N. et al. Look who’s talking now: Implications of AV’s explanations on driver’s trust, AV preference, anxiety and mental workload. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 104, 428–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.025 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Tan, H. et al. Knowledge as a key determinant of public support for autonomous vehicles. Sci. Rep. 14, 2156 (2024).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Zhang, T. et al. Automated vehicle acceptance in China: Social influence and initial trust are key determinants. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 112, 220–233 (2020).
Article
Google Scholar
Koo, J. et al. Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. (IJIDeM) 9, 269–275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-014-0227-2 (2015).
Article
Google Scholar
Körber, M., Prasch, L. & Bengler, K. Why do i have to drive now? Post hoc explanations of takeover requests. Hum. Factors 60, 305–323. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018720817747730 (2018).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Ruijten, P. A. M., Terken, J. M. B. & Chandramouli, S. N. Enhancing trust in autonomous vehicles through intelligent user interfaces that mimic human behavior. Multimod. Technol. Interact. 2, 62. https://doi.org/10.3390/mti2040062 (2018).
Article
Google Scholar
Hatfield, N. A. The Effects of Automation Transparency and Ethical Outcomes on User Trust and Blame Towards Fully Autonomous Vehicles (2018).
Forster, Y., Naujoks, F. & Neukum, A. Increasing anthropomorphism and trust in automated driving functions by adding speech output. In 2017 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV), 365–372, https://doi.org/10.1109/IVS.2017.7995746 (2017).
Zhang, Q., Yang, X. J. & Robert, L. P. What and when to explain? A survey of the impact of explanation on attitudes toward adopting automated vehicles. IEEE Access 9, 159533–159540. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3130489 (2021).
Article
Google Scholar
Montoya, R. M. & Horton, R. S. A meta-analytic investigation of the processes underlying the similarity-attraction effect. J. Soc. Pers. Relationships 30, 64–94 (2013).
Article
Google Scholar
Kim, J. K., Harold, C. M. & Holtz, B. C. Evaluations of abusive supervisors: The moderating role of the abuser’s gender. J. Organ. Behav. 43, 465–482 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, S., Ratan, R. & Park, T. The voice makes the car: Enhancing autonomous vehicle perceptions and adoption intention through voice agent gender and style. Multimodal Technol. Interact. 3, 20 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Vilage, G. Voice Control In Cars: Where Are We Headed? (2023).
AI Voice Assistants to Push Success of Autonomous Driving, Software-defined Vehicle.
Samuel, S. Sexist AI: Siri and Alexa reinforce gender stereotypes, says UN study – Vox (2019).
The voices on NYC subway? They come from Bloomberg Radio – Talking Biz News.
Zhang, Q., Yang, X. J. & Robert, L. P. Jr. Finding the right voice: exploring the impact of gender similarity and gender-role congruity on the efficacy of automated vehicle explanations. Proc. AAAI Symp. Ser. 2, 219–223. https://doi.org/10.1609/aaaiss.v2i1.27675 (2023).
Article
Google Scholar
Broverman, I. K., Vogel, S. R., Broverman, D. M., Clarkson, F. E. & Rosenkrantz, P. S. Sex-role stereotypes: A current appraisal 1. J. Soc. Issues 28, 59–78 (1972).
Article
Google Scholar
Brooks, A. W., Huang, L., Kearney, S. W. & Murray, F. E. Investors prefer entrepreneurial ventures pitched by attractive men. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 111, 4427–4431 (2014).
Article
ADS
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Steffen, V. J. Gender stereotypes stem from the distribution of women and men into social roles. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 46, 735 (1984).
Article
Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Makhijani, M. G. & Klonsky, B. G. Gender and the evaluation of leaders: A meta-analysis. Psychol. Bull. 111, 3 (1992).
Article
Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. & Karau, S. J. Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychol. review 109, 573 (2002).
Article
Google Scholar
Paek, H.-J., Nelson, M. R. & Vilela, A. M. Examination of gender-role portrayals in television advertising across seven countries. Sex Roles 64, 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-010-9850-y (2011).
Article
Google Scholar
Lewis, J. D. & Weigert, A. Trust as a social reality. Soc. Forces 63, 967–985. https://doi.org/10.1093/sf/63.4.967 (1985).
Article
Google Scholar
McAllister, D. J. Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations. Acad. Manag. J. 38, 24–59. https://doi.org/10.5465/256727 (1995).
Article
Google Scholar
Fox, J. & Gambino, A. Relationship development with humanoid social robots: Applying interpersonal theories to human–robot interaction. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 24, 294–299 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nass, C., Steuer, J. & Tauber, E. R. Computers are social actors. 72–78 (1994).
Nass, C. I. & Brave, S. Wired for Speech: How Voice Activates and Advances the Human-Computer Relationship (MIT press Cambridge, 2005).
Google Scholar
Edwards, C., Edwards, A., Stoll, B., Lin, X. & Massey, N. Evaluations of an artificial intelligence instructor’s voice: Social Identity Theory in human-robot interactions. Comput. Hum. Behav. 90, 357–362 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Nass, C. & Gong, L. Speech interfaces from an evolutionary perspective. Commun. ACM 43, 36–43 (2000).
Article
Google Scholar
Nass, C. et al. Improving automotive safety by pairing driver emotion and car voice emotion, 1973–1976 (2005).
He, F. & Burns, C. M. A Battle of voices: A study of the relationship between driving experience, driving style, and in-vehicle voice assistant character. In Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 236–242. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543174.3546845.
Loideain, N. N. & Adams, R. From Alexa to Siri and the GDPR: The gendering of virtual personal assistants and the role of data protection impact assessments. Comput. Law & Secur. Rev. 36, 105366 (2020).
Article
Google Scholar
Feine, J., Gnewuch, U., Morana, S. & Maedche, A. A taxonomy of social cues for conversational agents. Int. J. Human-Computer Stud. 132, 138–161 (2019).
Article
Google Scholar
Koenig, A. M. Comparing prescriptive and descriptive gender stereotypes about children, adults, and the elderly. Front. Psychol. 9, 1086 (2018).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Dong, J., Lawson, E., Olsen, J. & Jeon, M. Female voice agents in fully autonomous vehicles are not only more likeable and comfortable, but also more competent, Vol. 64, 1033–1037 (SAGE Publications Sage CA, 2020).
Lynch, S. & Campbell, M. Adolescents voice preference in auditory advertisements: A study in gender stereotypes and multi-media marketing. J. Stud. Res. 10 (2021).
Lee, E. J., Nass, C. & Brave, S. Can computer-generated speech have gender? An experimental test of gender stereotype. In CHI ’00 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA ’00, 289–290 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2000). https://doi.org/10.1145/633292.633461.
Eyssel, F., Kuchenbrandt, D., Bobinger, S., de Ruiter, L. & Hegel, F. ’If you sound like me, you must be more human’: on the interplay of robot and user features on human-robot acceptance and anthropomorphism. In Proceedings of the seventh annual ACM/IEEE international conference on Human-Robot Interaction, HRI ’12, 125–126, https://doi.org/10.1145/2157689.2157717 (Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2012).
Koch, A. J., D’Mello, S. D. & Sackett, P. R. A meta-analysis of gender stereotypes and bias in experimental simulations of employment decision making. J. Appl. Psychol. 100, 128 (2015).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Nag, P. & Yalçın, N. Gender stereotypes in virtual agents. 1–8 (2020).
Habler, F., Schwind, V. & Henze, N. Effects of Smart Virtual Assistants’ Gender and Language. In Proceedings of Menschund Computer 2019, 469–473 (ACM, Hamburg Germany, 2019) https://doi.org/10.1145/3340764.3344441.
Danielescu, A. Eschewing gender stereotypes in voice assistants to promote inclusion. 1–3 (2020).
Nass, C. I., Moon, Y. & Morkes, J. Computers are social actors: A review of current. Hum. Values Design Comput. Technol. 72, 137 (1997).
Google Scholar
Tay, B., Jung, Y. & Park, T. When stereotypes meet robots: The double-edge sword of robot gender and personality in human–robot interaction. Comput. Hum. Behav. 38, 75–84 (2014).
Article
Google Scholar
Choi, H. et al. On the use of simulation in robotics: Opportunities, challenges, and suggestions for moving forward. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 118, e1907856118 (2021).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhang, Q., Yang, X. J. & Robert Jr, L. P. From the head or the heart? an experimental design on the impact of explanation on cognitive and affective trust. arXiv preprint arXiv:2110.03433 (2021).
Lee, J.-G. & Lee, K. M. Polite speech strategies and their impact on drivers’ trust in autonomous vehicles. Comput. Hum. Behav. 127, 107015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2021.107015 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Gambino, A., Fox, J. & Ratan, R. A. Building a stronger CASA: Extending the computers are social actors paradigm. Hum.-Mach. Commun. 1, 71–85 (2020).
Article
Google Scholar
Lee, J.-E. R. & Nass, C. I. Trust in computers: The computers-are-social-actors (CASA) paradigm and trustworthiness perception in human-computer communication. In Trust and Technology in a Ubiquitous Modern Environment: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives, 1–15 (IGI Global, 2010).
Moussawi, S. & Benbunan-Fich, R. The effect of voice and humour on users’ perceptions of personal intelligent agents. Behav. Inf. Technol. 40, 1603–1626. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2020.1772368 (2021).
Article
Google Scholar
Borau, S., Otterbring, T., Laporte, S. & Fosso Wamba, S. The most human bot: Female gendering increases humanness perceptions of bots and acceptance of AI. Psychol. Mark. 38, 1052–1068 (2021).
Article
Google Scholar
Byrne, D. E. The Attraction Paradigm Vol. 462 (Academic Press, 1971).
Google Scholar
Wetzel, C. G. & Insko, C. A. The similarity-attraction relationship: Is there an ideal one?. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 18, 253–276 (1982).
Article
Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E. Gender stereotypes and workplace bias. Res. Organ. Behav. 32, 113–135 (2012).
Google Scholar
Heilman, M. E., Block, C. J. & Martell, R. F. Sex stereotypes: Do they influence perceptions of managers?. J. Soc. Behavior Pers. 10, 237 (1995).
Google Scholar
Lyness, K. S. & Heilman, M. E. When fit is fundamental: performance evaluations and promotions of upper-level female and male managers. J. Appl. Psychol. 91, 777 (2006).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Arnett, J. J. Developmental sources of crash risk in young drivers. Inj. Prev. 8, ii17–ii23. https://doi.org/10.1136/ip.8.suppl_2.ii17 (2002).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Irwin, M. R., Cole, J. C. & Nicassio, P. M. Comparative meta-analysis of behavioral interventions for insomnia and their efficacy in middle-aged adults and in older adults 55+ years of age. Heal. Psychol. 25, 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.25.1.3 (2006).
Article
Google Scholar
Whittaker, L., Kietzmann, J., Letheren, K., Mulcahy, R. & Russell-Bennett, R. Brace yourself! Why managers should adopt a synthetic media incident response playbook in an age of falsity and synthetic media. Bus. Horizons https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2022.07.004 (2022).
Article
Google Scholar
Latinus, M. & Taylor, M. J. Discriminating male and female voices: Differentiating pitch and gender. Brain Topogr. 25, 194–204. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-011-0207-9 (2012).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Leung, Y., Oates, J. & Chan, S. P. Voice, articulation, and prosody contribute to listener perceptions of speaker gender: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Speech Lang. Hear. Res. 61, 266–297. https://doi.org/10.1044/2017_JSLHR-S-17-0067 (2018).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Pernet, C. R. & Belin, P. The role of pitch and timbre in voice gender categorization. Front. Psychol. 3, 23 (2012).
Article
PubMed
PubMed Central
Google Scholar
Schoettle, B. & Sivak, M. A survey of public opinion about autonomous and self-driving vehicles in the US, the UK, and Australia (University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Transportation Research Institute, 2014).
Google Scholar
Hoy, M. B. Alexa, Siri, Cortana, and more: An introduction to voice assistants. Med. Ref. Serv. Q. 37, 81–88 (2018).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Zhang, Z., Tian, R. & Duffy, V. G. Trust in automated vehicle: A meta-analysis. In Human-automation interaction: Transportation (eds Duffy, V. G. et al.) 221–234 (Springer International Publishing, 2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-10784-9_13.
Chapter
Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y. & Phillips, L. W. Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Adm. Sci. Q. 36, 421–458 (1991).
Article
Google Scholar
Fornell, C. & Larcker, D. F. Structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error: Algebra and statistics. J. Market. Res. 18, 382 (1981).
Article
Google Scholar
Netemeyer, R., Bearden, W. & Sharma, S. Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications (Sage Publications, 2003).
Book
MATH
Google Scholar
Streiner, D. L. Starting at the beginning: An introduction to coefficient alpha and internal consistency. J. Pers. Assess. 80, 99–103 (2003).
Article
PubMed
Google Scholar
Cronbach, L. J. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika 16, 297–334 (1951).
Article
MATH
Google Scholar
Snijders, T. A. & Bosker, R. Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling (Sage, 2011).
MATH
Google Scholar
Lorah, J. Effect size measures for multilevel models: Definition, interpretation, and TIMSS example. Large-Scale Assess. Educ. 6(1), 1–11 (2018).
Article
Google Scholar
Cohen, J. Quantitative methods in psychology: A power primer. Psychol. Bull. 112, 1155–1159 (1992).
Article
Google Scholar
Ye, X., Bhatti, S. & Robert, L. Gender and Security Robot Interactions: A Brief Review and Critique. AMCIS 2024 Proceedings (2024).