Category: usa news today

  • U.S. Army is planning a parade for its anniversary — and Trump’s birthday

    U.S. Army is planning a parade for its anniversary — and Trump’s birthday

    WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump might finally get his parade. 

    The U.S. Army is planning a big celebration to recognize not only the 250th anniversary of its founding, but also President Trump’s 79th birthday, both of which fall on June 14. That celebration will potentially bring tanks and hundreds of other military vehicles and aircraft onto and over the streets of the nation’s capital in June, according to three defense officials familiar with the planning.

    During Trump’s first term, the president sought to have a big military parade, but the plans were shelved over cost and concerns that some of the military vehicles, particularly tracked vehicles like tanks, could significantly damage the streets of Washington, D.C. and incur a huge price tag for repairs. The estimate for the parade being planned now is “tens of millions of dollars,” according to two of the defense officials. 

    Trump didn’t forget and now is considering a military parade to honor both birthdays. Current plans call for more than 150 military vehicles and 50 aircraft to rumble through a parade route through Washington on June 10, the three defense officials said. That could include Army wheeled vehicles, like Humvees and trucks, and so-called tracked vehicles, like tanks, two of the officials said.

    The aircraft will include CH-47 Chinook helicopters and UH 60 Black Hawk helicopters, two of the officials said. And the famed Golden Knights are expected to jump from above, land near the viewing stands, and deliver a flag to the VIPs, most likely Trump, two of the officials said. 

    The Army is celebrating its 250th birthday with a number of events, including a fireworks display, a festival and a parade, Army spokesman Steve Warren said in a statement. “Parade planning is actively underway, and we anticipate approximately 150 vehicles, 50 aircraft, and 6,600 Soldiers to highlight the Army’s 250 years of service to the nation,” Warren said.

    US Army Golden Knights Parachute Team carrying an American flag, land at the Ellipse of the White House on the Fourth of July in 2020.
    U.S. Army Golden Knights Parachute Team, carrying an American flag, land at the Ellipse of the White House on the Fourth of July in 2020.Oliver Contreras / The Washington Post / Getty Images file

    The plan for the tanks is not yet final. One option under consideration is to put the tanks on trailers, which would mitigate some of the damage to the streets, but that could also impact the aesthetics of the parade, officials said. They also plan to have a separate staging area for the heavy vehicles so they do not have to cross any of D.C.’s bridges, two of the officials said.

    The vehicles would roll down the streets of Washington in columns, the officials said, in a way that some critics of the planned parade in his first term compared to what is more typically seen in places like North Korea and Russia. For now, the plan is to have Bradley Fighting Vehicles, Stryker Armored Fighting Vehicles, the Army’s new Infantry Squad Vehicles and more, the officials said. All the Army vehicles would be drawn from the Army’s 10 divisions, brought in mostly via train from bases like Fort Bliss, Texas to Fort Drum, New York. 

    Each division will dedicate between 200 and 400 people to the parade, the officials said. Under the current plan, some of the troops would sleep in government buildings, including the Department of Agriculture and U.S. General Services Administration buildings, according to two of the defense officials.

    Asked about the parade last month, D.C. Mayor Muriel Bowser confirmed that planning was in the early stages and that the Trump administration had reached out about it, but said she had not been directly involved yet.

    The parade theme will include U.S. wars throughout the Army’s history and include soldiers marching in period uniforms, the officials explained. 

    The plans are still evolving but the current early estimate is the parade and static displays in D.C. will cost as much as $45 million, according to two of the defense officials, who said that could change as planning continues. The final estimates from inside the Army are not yet complete as plans for the parade have not yet been fully approved by the White House and the Army, two of the officials said. 

    Individual Army units will bear the ultimate cost of the parade, three of the officials said. In some cases, units would have to spend more than $1 million to participate. That could impact funds used for training, officials said. “Could the parade potentially impact training? Absolutely,” said one of the defense officials. “Will it impact training? That’s unclear.”

  • Trump admin asks Supreme Court to let DOGE access Social Security data

    Trump admin asks Supreme Court to let DOGE access Social Security data

    play

    WASHINGTON – The Trump administration asked the Supreme Court on May 2 to let Elon Musk’s Department of Government Efficiency access the data of millions of Americans kept by the U.S. Social Security Administration.

    A federal judge in Maryland blocked DOGE from getting their hands on the data after she found the agency likely violated a federal privacy law when it gave DOGE unlimited access.

    The administration said the judge overstepped, viewing DOGE as the equivalent of intruders breaking into hotel rooms instead of employees trying to modernize the agency’s technology and root out waste.

    “District courts should not be able to wield the Privacy Act to substitute their own view of the government’s ‘needs’ for that of the President and agency heads,” Solicitor General John Sauer told the Supreme Court.

    DOGE has sought access to multiple agencies as part of its mission to hunt for wasteful spending and dramatically overhaul the federal government.

    Musk has falsely claimed that millions of deceased Americans are still receiving Social Security checks.

    Two labor unions and an advocacy group sued the SSA.

    In March, U.S. District Judge Ellen Lipton Hollander of Maryland said DOGE was intruding into “the personal affairs of millions of Americans” in a fishing expedition that’s based on little more than suspicion.”

    A divided federal appeals court on April 30 rejected the Trump administration’s request to intervene.

    U.S. Circuit Judge Robert King said the government hadn’t shown a need for unfettered access to the highly sensitive personal information that the American people had every reason to believe would be “fiercely protected.”

    DOGE’s mission can be largely accomplished through anonymized and redacted data, the usual way the agency has handled technology upgrades and fraud detection, he wrote.

    In a dissent, U.S. Circuit Judge Julius Richardson said the appeals court should have allowed access as it did in cases involving the U.S. Treasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel Management.

    While the Social Security Administration’s databases are larger, the legal questions “presumably come out the same whether they contain on million rows or one hundred million rows,” he wrote.

    The Supreme Court set a May 12 deadline for the labor unions to respond to the administration’s appeal.

    (This story has been updated with new information.)

  • DAVID MARCUS: Trump vs Democrats: How we can keep our friendships despite our differences

    DAVID MARCUS: Trump vs Democrats: How we can keep our friendships despite our differences

    Join Fox News for access to this content

    Plus special access to select articles and other premium content with your account – free of charge.

    By entering your email and pushing continue, you are agreeing to Fox News’ Terms of Use and Privacy Policy, which includes our Notice of Financial Incentive.

    Please enter a valid email address.

    NEWYou can now listen to Fox News articles!

    Over the past eight months, as I have been traversing the country, there is one inescapable but silent issue that I hear over and over again. Put bluntly, we don’t like each other very much.

    In every state I’ve traveled to, I hear stories of family members and friends lost to the swarming waves of political anger, and I’m not here to say one side is to blame, though I have suspicions. I am here to say that I think I might have recently met the solution.

    In Morgantown, West Virginia, having dinner one night recently, I met Mack and Michael, among the most unique pair of friends I have ever come across. 

    DAVID MARCUS: TRUMP’S FIRST 100 DAYS MATTER. BUT THE NEXT 100 DAYS WILL TELL THE TALE OF THE TRUMP ERA

    Mack the elder, at 79, and Mike, a sprightly 52, met years ago when they both worked in the area for a major corporation. Mack is a Democrat and no fan of President Donald Trump, Mike on the other hand votes GOP and sees Trump as a godsend. 

    “We talk about politics a lot,” Mike told me over some ramp deviled eggs, (ramp is an Appalachian delicacy, a kind of garlicky wild green onion) “but we try to stick to facts, not get too emotional.”

    Mack added, “There are more important things than politics.”

    David Marcus with friends on WV

    In the hour or so that we spent talking, political issues did creep in, the tariffs, immigration, and one of the things I noted was that every time things started to seem a bit heated, Mike and Mack had nonverbal cues that kept things light, and on track.

    West Virginia was a Democratic state for a long time,” Mack correctly told Mike and I, “now it’s Republican, but the people are still the people.”

    “I live outside of Morgantown, because it’s so liberal here, but people get along,” Mike added, his oldest boy is serving with 101st Airborne at Ft Campbell, something both men clearly took great pride in. 

    “My dad served in World War II,” Mack said, adding, “he was a hard man but loved his family and his country.”

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE FOX NEWS OPINION 

    What came across, and I mean this in the manliest possible way, is that these two guys, this unlikely pair, really love each other. They know each other’s families. Mike would constantly say, “Mack, tell him that story about JFK, or the old days.”

    Ultimately, a friend is not the person who can tell you what you want to hear. Anyone can do that. It is the person who can question your judgment while still valuing you as a person, but this is something the American left, and increasingly the right, have lost sight of.

    I wish I could bottle whatever these guys have that let them rise above their political differences. 

    The next night, I found myself in Charleston, and like most state capitals, you can smell the power, a fragrant mix of lobbying cash, steak houses and strip clubs. There I met Brandon, who was passing through town for work.

    David Marcus WV photo

    I asked why he thought so many people in our country are so divided by politics, why so many friendships have been fractured and families frayed, why it’s not like the 90s when politics was an afterthought.

    “Well, we didn’t define each other by our political views back then,” he told me. “We defined each other by how we treated each other, number one. Number two, I think the reason it happened so quickly, was COVID, and people lost their *****ing minds, lost their ability to define a human being, by who they are instead of their political views.” 

    Brandon finished by saying this is what happens: “When you put somebody in a house and all they have is constant bombardment of bullsh*t, and the division of a country, on purpose.”

    What struck me about both of these West Virginia encounters is that the essential element to overcoming political division is physical human interaction. And at a time when Mark Zuckerberg and Meta want to give us all, and our kids, artificial intelligence friends, this gets scary.

    Ultimately, a friend is not the person who can tell you what you want to hear. Anyone can do that. It is the person who can question your judgment while still valuing you as a person, but this is something the American left, and increasingly the right, have lost sight of.

    CLICK HERE TO GET THE FOX NEWS APP

    When you sit in a town you’ve never been to as darkness falls and light a cigarette, you see quiet lives drift beyond corners, and know that everywhere, everyone is just as important to themselves as you are to you. 

    Mike and Mack realized that about each other a long time ago, and what flourished from it, what I saw clearly, was a model of friendship for all of us, and maybe, it is friendship, not politics, that can pave a better way forward.

    CLICK HERE FOR MORE FROM DAVID MARCUS

  • Stock market today: S&P 500 wipes out Trump tariff losses, marks longest winning streak in 20 years as trade war cools

    Stock market today: S&P 500 wipes out Trump tariff losses, marks longest winning streak in 20 years as trade war cools

    A possible thawing in US-China trade tensions boosted spirits after earnings from Apple and Amazon shed light on the likely cost of tariffs.
  • Foreign visitors subject to tough new ‘one strike’ policy

    Foreign visitors subject to tough new ‘one strike’ policy

    play

    The Trump administration has a tough new message for foreigners in the United States: One strike, and you’re out.

    Foreign nationals visiting or living in the country legally could lose their visa status if they run afoul of the law under the new and unforgiving so-called “catch and revoke” policy, announced by Secretary of State Marco Rubio.

    “There is now a one-strike policy: Catch-And-Revoke,” Rubio said in a social media post on May 2. “Whenever the government catches non-U.S. citizens breaking our laws, we will take action to revoke their status.”

    The policy, originally announced April 30 in a newsletter authored by Rubio, suggests it will pursue immigrants convicted of criminal activity, including domestic violence and assault.

    But the policy announcement didn’t specify the spectrum of crimes that could result in a visa revocation, and immigration experts questioned how it might be implemented, given the Trump administration’s far-reaching crackdown.

    David Bier, director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute, called the new policy “absurd” and contrary to U.S. immigration law.

    “Wealthy, skilled people with other options will not settle in a country where their lives can be ruined for a speeding ticket or operating an illegal lemonade stand,” he said in a post on X.

    The State Department issues non-immigrant visas to tourists, students, nannies, investors, the spouses and children of legal permanent residents, and other categories of visitors and residents.

    Rubio said the State Department, under his leadership, “has now made clear that a visa is a privilege, not a right.”

    Most recently, the administration aggressively targeted student visa holders who have protested Israel’s war in Gaza or voiced pro-Palestinian views. Students with minor violations, including traffic infractions, have also seen their visas terminated.

    “They stripped student visas from people for speeding tickets,” said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, in a post on X. “Now they’re suggesting they’ll do the same to everyone.”

    The administration in late April reversed its decision to cancel the visas of hundreds of foreign students nationwide after students and their supporters filed numerous court challenges.

  • Trump’s DOJ settles case with family of Jan. 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt

    Trump’s DOJ settles case with family of Jan. 6 rioter Ashli Babbitt

    play

    The Trump administration has agreed to settle a lawsuit brought by the family of Ashli Babbitt, a Trump supporter who was killed when she tried to storm the House Speaker’s lobby during the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol, according to media reports.

    Babbitt’s family filed the lawsuit in early 2024, seeking $30 million for her death. Financial details of the settlement weren’t revealed at a Friday hearing in a D.C. federal court, according to CBS News and Washington Post reports.

    U.S. Capitol Police Lt. Michael Byrd shot and killed 35-year-old Babbitt as members of Congress were still in the lobby after Trump supporters violently stormed the Capitol to try to stop congressional certification of Joe Biden‘s 2020 election victory.

    Babbitt’s mother, Micki Witthoeft, has emerged as a stalwart advocate for the Jan. 6 rioters who faced criminal charges in the months and years following the attack. She was charged with two traffic violations in early 2023, including failing to obey Capitol Police orders, during a protest on the two-year anniversary of the attack.

    The settlement comes after Trump granted clemency to about 1,500 defendants who faced charges for their alleged – and in many instances, convicted – roles in the attack.

    In the lawsuit, Babbitt’s estate alleged that Babbitt wrongfully died as a result of government negligence. Under the Biden administration, Justice Department lawyers moved to dismiss several of the claims in the lawsuit. Four days after Trump took office on Jan. 20, department lawyers and Babbitt’s estate asked for a scheduled court hearing on that motion to be delayed.

  • Trump’s judge attacks ‘designed to intimidate’

    Trump’s judge attacks ‘designed to intimidate’

    play

    WASHINGTON, May 1 (Reuters) – U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson said on Thursday attacks by President Donald Trump and his Republican allies on judges were “not random” and seemed “designed to intimidate the judiciary.”

    U.S. Chief Justice John Roberts rebuked Trump in March for urging the impeachment of a federal judge, laying bare tensions between the country’s executive and the judiciary as Trump’s sweeping assertions of power encounter judicial obstacles.

    “The attacks are not random. They seem designed to intimidate those of us who serve in this critical capacity,” Jackson said at a judges’ conference in Puerto Rico.

    Federal judges have said the Trump administration has failed to comply with court orders regarding foreign aid, federal spending and the firing of government workers. The administration disputes it has defied judges but has been critical of orders and judges that have blocked its actions.

    “The threats and harassment are attacks on our democracy, on our system of government. And they ultimately risk undermining our Constitution and the rule of law,” Jackson said.

    Jackson, an appointee of former Democratic President Joe Biden, did not mention Trump by name but spoke about “the elephant in the room.”

    Her comments were cited in media reports from Politico and the New York Times, with Politico noting that her comments got a standing ovation.

    The combative atmosphere under the Trump administration has raised concerns among some legal experts of a potential constitutional crisis.

    The Supreme Court has a 6-3 conservative majority.

  • What to know about some Democrats’ push in Congress to impeach Trump

    What to know about some Democrats’ push in Congress to impeach Trump

    play

    WASHINGTON – President Donald Trump on Thursday blasted Democrats in Congress pushing impeachment efforts against him, arguing that Republicans “should start to think” about expelling them.

    Trump’s comments come after Michigan Democrat Rep. Shri Thanedar introduced an impeachment resolution against Trump this week, citing a “sweeping abuse of power, flagrant violations of the Constitution, and acts of tyranny that undermine American democracy and threaten the rule of law.” 

    Texas Democrat Rep. Al Green has also previously said he will present articles of impeachment against Trump. 

    “The Democrats are really out of control…They have already got two “No Name,” little respected Congressmen, total Whackjobs both, throwing the “Impeachment” of DONALD J. TRUMP around, for about the 20th time, even though they have no idea for what I would be Impeached,” Trump wrote in a Truth Social Post.

    Here’s what to know about some Democrats’ efforts to impeach Trump.

    Thanedar and Green’s efforts are unlikely to go anywhere in GOP-controlled House

    Thanedar’s resolution includes seven articles of impeachment that detail what he alleges are “constitutional violations.” They include “abuse of trade powers and international aggression,” “creation of an unlawful office” (referencing the Department of Government Efficiency), and “obstruction of justice and abuse of executive power.”

    Donald Trump has repeatedly demonstrated that he is unfit to serve as President and represents a clear and present danger to our nation’s constitution and our democracy,” Thanedar said in a statement.

    But his resolution has created some tension among House Democrats. Three lawmakers – Reps. Kweisi Mfume of Maryland, Robin Kelly of Illinois and Jerry Nadler of New York  – had originally signed on to be co-sponsors of the resolution but later removed their names after learning it was not reviewed by leadership, according to The Hill. 

    Green has brought up articles of impeachment multiple times in Trump’s first term, and vowed to do so during his second term. On Thursday, Green previewed his articles of impeachment on the House floor. 

    Thanedar and Green’s efforts will likely go nowhere in a Republican-controlled House, since a simple majority vote is needed to approve articles of impeachment.

    House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar said at a press conference earlier this week that “Impeachment is, at times, a tool that can be used. This president is no stranger to that; he’s been impeached twice.” 

    Trump was impeached twice during his first term in office.  In 2019, his impeachment was prompted over allegations that he pressured Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to investigate his political opponent Joe Biden; in 2021, he was impeached for “incitement of insurrection” at the U.S. Capitol on Jan. 6. But both times, he was acquitted by the Senate.

    “But we don’t have any confidence that House and Senate Republicans would do their jobs, and so this is not an exercise that we’re willing to undertake,” he said. 

    Can the House expel a member?

    Yes, but it’s not that simple.

    The Constitution’s article one section five notes that “Each House may determine the Rules of its Proceedings, punish its Members for disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.”

    But Republicans would need Democratic support to carry out an expulsion effort.

    “I wouldn’t say that today’s Republican majorities in either the House or Senate could by themselves expel Democrats,” said Sarah Binder, professor of political science at George Washington University.

    “Small GOP majorities would find themselves about 70 votes shy in the House and 14 votes shy in the Senate,” she said.

    In 2023, Republican George Santos became the sixth House member in history to be expelled from Congress.

  • Workers install chimney at Sistine Chapel

    Workers install chimney at Sistine Chapel

    play

    With the funeral of Pope Francis now behind us, officials at the Vatican are getting ready for the conclave, which will ultimately choose the new pope.

    On Friday morning, May 2, Vatican workers were seen hoisting a chimney onto the roof at the Sistine Chapel, according to photos and video taken by Reuters. The chimney will soon be used to display the smoke from burnt ballots during the conclave to elect Pope Francis’ successor.

    Beginning on May 7, cardinals will gather to choose a new Pope, with black smoke being the sign of no decision and white smoke showing that a new pope has been elected.

    According to Reuters, the rust-colored pipe now attached to the Sistine Chapel can be seen from St. Peter’s Square, where crowds are expected to gather during the conclave to see if the smoke is black or white.

    See workers install the chimney

    Contributing: Reuters

    Fernando Cervantes Jr. is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. Reach him at fernando.cervantes@gannett.com and follow him on X @fern_cerv_.

  • Trump pulls funding from NPR, PBS. Can I still tune in?

    Trump pulls funding from NPR, PBS. Can I still tune in?


    ‘We will vigorously defend our right to provide essential news, information and life-saving services to the American public,’ Katherine Maher, NPR’s president and CEO, said.

    play

    President Donald Trump on May 1 signed an executive order to pull federal funding from the Corporation for Public Broadcasting, imperiling America’s largest public broadcasters and hundreds of associated local and regional radio and television channels.

    Trump’s decision makes good on weeks of threats from administration officials and Republican lawmakers toward the public media outlets, accusing them of biased reporting.

    The order instructs the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) Board of Directors and all executive departments and agencies to cease direct federal funding for NPR and PBS “to the maximum extent allowed by law” and to “decline to provide future funding.” However, the corporation is not a federal agency subject to such directives, putting the efficacy of the order into doubt.

    The existing board of directors filed a lawsuit against the Trump administration on Tuesday, April 29, after the president attempted to remove three of the five board members.

    Patricia Harrison, president and CEO of CPB, released a statement Friday, May 2, criticizing the decision and referring to protections afforded by Congress when it was established over 55 years ago.

    “CPB is not a federal executive agency subject to the President’s authority,” Harrison said. “Congress directly authorized and funded CPB to be a private nonprofit corporation wholly independent of the federal government.”

    What is the Corporation for Public Broadcasting?

    The Corporation for Public Broadcasting is a private, nonprofit corporation authorized by Congress in 1967 by the Public Broadcasting Act.

    It was established to “encourage the growth and development of public radio and television broadcasting,” asserting public media services are “valuable local community resources” for addressing national concerns and solving local problems, according to the Act.

    CPB does not produce programming and does not own, operate or control any public broadcasting stations. It helps support the operations of more than 1,500 locally managed and operated public television and radio stations nationwide, its website says, making it the nation’s largest source of funding for research, technology and program development for public radio, television and related online services.

    Can you still tune in to PBS and NPR?

    Each news organization and their partner stations remain fully operational as of Friday, May 2, and leaders of CPB are preparing to challenge the order.

    Paula Kerger, president and CEO of PBS, called the executive order “blatantly unlawful” in a statement on May 2 and said the organization is “currently exploring all options to allow PBS to continue to serve our member stations and all Americans.”

    Katherine Maher, NPR’s president and CEO, defended the outlet’s journalism and reiterated its commitment to editorial independence in the wake of allegations of bias by the Trump administration.

    “We will vigorously defend our right to provide essential news, information and life-saving services to the American public,” she said. “We will challenge this Executive Order using all means available. “

    Both NPR and PBS have previously said that Trump’s effort to cut their funding would disrupt essential media services and have a “devastating impact” on Americans who rely on them for credible local and national news, including during emergencies.

    How much money do NPR and PBS receive from the government?

    The CPB received $525 million in federal funding in 2024. More than 70% of those dollars goes directly to local NPR and PBS stations in the form of Community Service Grants, according to a CPB fact sheet. The majority of funds go to local tv and radio stations, with nearly all content free for anyone to access.

    NPR receives about 1% of its funding directly from the federal government, according to the outlet.

    The top 20 most popular NPR-affiliated public radio stations had on average eight million weekly listeners in 2022, Pew Research data shows. PBS reaches 58% of all U.S. television households annually, they report, with more than 130 million people watching on TV. More than 16 million people tune in to PBS’ website and apps each month, and another 53 million watch PBS on its Digital Studios platform and on YouTube.

    Trump administration’s threats against US media

    This is just the latest assault on media institutions by the Trump administration, preceded by attempts to block the Associated Press from the Oval Office over the president’s renaming of the Gulf of Mexico, suing Paramount over a “60 Minutes” interview and a March 14 executive order attempting to dismantle news outlet Voice of America.

    The Federal Communications Commission is mounting assorted investigations against CBS, ABC, NBC, NPR, and PBS, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, raising concerns they are politically motivated.

    The Trump administration has labeled multiple institutions in academia and the media industry — from Harvard and Columbia universities to NPR and PBS — as being leftist, Marxist, biased, and woke, and threatened funding cuts. Human rights advocates have raised concerns over free speech and academic freedom.

    “After a century of gradual expansion of press rights in the United States, the country is experiencing its first significant and prolonged decline in press freedom in modern history,” says media watchdog group Reporters Without Borders. “Donald Trump’s return to the presidency is greatly exacerbating the situation.”

    Contributing: Reuters

    Kathryn Palmer is a trending news reporter for USA TODAY. You can reach her at kapalmer@usatoday.com and on X @KathrynPlmr.