Category: usa news today

  • Citing ‘internal data,’ DHS touts surge in deportations

    Citing ‘internal data,’ DHS touts surge in deportations


    Experts are questioning an administration claim that it has deported 139,000 immigrants in 100 days.

    play

    To meet President Donald Trump’s goal of deporting 1 million people a year, the administration would have to have sent well over 100,000 people packing in his first 100 days.

    On Trump’s 99th day in office, his border czar says the administration is on track, deporting 139,000 people since Trump’s inauguration.

    “The numbers are good,” Tom Homan said April 28 during a news conference at the White House.

    But immigration experts say the figures don’t add up.

    U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, which is required by Congress to publicly share detention and deportation information every two weeks, has reported removing less than half that number, roughly 57,000 people.

    The difference could be explained if there were more deportations along the nation’s borders, which are controlled by U.S. Customs and Border Protection.

    But the Trump administration successfully sealed the Mexican border within days of taking office, so arrests there have slowed to a trickle, government data confirms.

    “Unless they deported 30,000-plus people to Canada, I’m not seeing it,” said Adam Isacson, director of defense oversight at the left-leaning Washington Office on Latin America. There is no indication that many people have been removed to Canada.

    Transparency in numbers is important, he and other immigration experts said.

    “The public deserves to have a very transparent accounting of the enforcement that has been happening under the Trump administration policies,” said Jessica Vaughan, director of policy studies at the right-leaning Center for Immigration Studies.

    “That kind of transparency is necessary for evaluating their results,” she said. “Otherwise these numbers are meaningless, especially in comparison to previous years.”

    What the numbers show

    Public records show a surge in immigration enforcement under Trump: a sharp decline in illegal border crossings, increased immigrant arrests and a growing number of people in ICE detention. But not 139,000 deportations.

    “It would have required a massive shift in who is conducting deportations or how deportations are being counted to even begin to get close to the claim of 139,000,” said Austin Kocher, a Syracuse University researcher who regularly compiles and analyzes immigration data.

    The administration hasn’t produced government records that would allow for independent scrutiny – a hallmark of accountability in governance.

    “The administration is either engaging in a highly creative accounting scheme to inflate the perception of deportations or simply pulling these numbers out of thin air,” Kocher said.

    There have been roughly 400 ICE deportation flights since Trump took office, according to Tom Cartwright, who tracks ICE flights daily as a volunteer for Witness at the Border. At roughly 125 people per plane, that’s 50,000 people in total, which squares with ICE’s own reporting.

    “It seems ICE would have needed to operate around double the number of charter flight deportations by air other than the 400 observed to date,” Cartwright said. “I just don’t find these numbers plausible unless DHS is including some amorphous estimate for self-deportations. I would love to know.”

    USA TODAY asked the White House and DHS to clarify what is counted in the deportations number. DHS spokeswoman Tricia McLaughlin told USA TODAY it includes removals by CBP and is based on “internal data.”

    “We are confident in our numbers,” she said.

    The White House press office was copied on communications with USA TODAY and DHS but didn’t offer a separate response.

    Why it’s gotten harder to deport people

    In past administrations, the bulk of deportations came from people who crossed the border illegally.

    But apprehensions at the U.S.-Mexico border have dropped dramatically under Trump, as illegal border crossings have declined, according to CBP data. That’s made it challenging for the Trump administration to quickly raise its deportations number.

    Interior enforcement takes more time and resources. It can take as many as half a dozen ICE agents to detain a single person when targeting immigrants in the interior. Still, ICE arrests and detentions have risen, as the Trump administration has deputized other federal agents to conduct immigration enforcement and CBP customs officers have referred more travelers to ICE for detention and deportation.

    “They’ve talked about being transparent about this,” said David Bier, director of immigration studies at the libertarian Cato Institute. “And certainly they want to note their accomplishments, so what’s the problem with giving some more information than just one number with no breakdown or explanation?”

    It’s not clear what the administration is counting to reach 139,000 deportations, Vaughan said. The administration hasn’t detailed what removal categories they’re including.

    “They have a lot to be proud of,” Vaughan said of the administration. “There is no need to hide the removal statistics within a basket of other types of enforcement.”

    Bart Jansen contributed to this report.

    Lauren Villagran can be reached at lvillagran@usatoday.com.

  • EPA continues efforts to cut staff, pushes for voluntary exits

    EPA continues efforts to cut staff, pushes for voluntary exits


    EPA will try again in another round of offers to convince its employees to take deferred resignations or early retirements.

    play

    Employees at the Environmental Protection Agency got another nudge toward the door in an email offering a second chance at voluntary retirement or deferred resignation.

    The agency is encouraging thousands of workers who remain after several rounds of buyouts and layoffs to voluntarily leave the agency, according to an April 28 email received by USA TODAY.

    The ongoing staff reductions are part of a sweeping effort by President Donald Trump‘s administration to slash the size of the federal work force and reduce federal spending and the federal deficit.

    The EPA, charged with protecting human health and the environment since 1970, has already reduced its staff by more than 1,000 workers, Administrator Lee Zeldin said previously. That includes a reported 388 probationary employees terminated in February and hundreds of employees who accepted the administration’s initial deferred resignation, known as the Fork-in-the-Road program.

    It’s unknown how many EPA employees accepted the Fork-in-the-Road or the voluntary retirement offers. Before the reductions started, the agency had an estimated work force of roughly 15,000.

    On April 22, reduction-in-force letters were sent to nearly 200 employees of its Office of Environmental Justice and External Civil Rights, notifying them that terminations were scheduled to take effect July 31.

    A union that represents more than 8,400 EPA employees is pushing back against those staff reductions.

    Decimating our agency and Environmental Justice workforce goes against our oath to protect human health and to keep our planet healthy and habitable for future generations,” Joyce Howell, executive vice president of AFGE Council 238, previously told Reuters.

    The two departure programs are being offered to most employees, with some exclusions, according to the April 28 notice. It excludes workers in the offices of the chief financial officer, mission support, inspector general and enforcement and compliance assurance, employees who have received a notice about a planned reduction in force, and those in a few specific positions such as law enforcement, national security or public safety, according to the announcement.

    The window to accept one of the two options will be open until midnight on May 5, according to the letter. Employees who accept the deferred resignations must leave work no later than June 16, unless there’s a “mission essential” need for the employee to stay longer.

    Employees, including full-time and part-time employees across a broad range of positions, may opt to resign or retire. The Voluntary Early Retirement Authority (known as VERA) temporarily lowers the age and service requirements for retirement, but the employees must be at least 50 with 20 years of service or any age with 25 years of federal service, according to the letter.

    The letter to employees refers to Feb. 26 guidance from Russell Vought, director of the Office of Management and Budget, on implementing the Department of Government Efficiency’s “workforce optimization initiative.”

    “The federal government is costly, inefficient, and deeply in debt,” Vought stated email, sent to the heads of all executive departments and agencies. “At the same time, it is not producing results for the American public. Instead, tax dollars are being siphoned off to fund unproductive and unnecessary programs that benefit radical interest groups while hurting hardworking American citizens.”

    Vought, a key architect of the Heritage Foundation’s “Project 2025,” served as the head of the federal budget office during Trump’s first term.

    Vought previously criticized federal bureaucrats in private speeches in 2023 and 2024, particularly the EPA, according to reporting by the nonprofit investigative news site Pro Publica. In a video Pro Publica obtained, Vought stated: “We want their funding to be shut down so that the EPA can’t do all of the rules against our energy industry because they have no bandwidth financially to do so. We want to put them in trauma.

    Dinah Voyles Pulver, a national correspondent for USA TODAY, has covered the environment, climate change and other news for decades. Reach her at dpulver@usatoday.com or @dinahvp on Bluesky or X or dinahvp.77 on Signal.

  • ‘I run the country and the world’

    ‘I run the country and the world’

    play

    WASHINGTON ― President Donald Trump declared that he runs the world as he reflected on what’s different during his second White House go around in an interview with The Atlantic magazine.

    “The first time, I had two things to do ‒ run the country and survive; I had all these crooked guys,” Trump said in the interview, published April 28. “And the second time, I run the country and the world.”

    Trump has pushed the boundaries of the presidency during his first 100 days back in the White House, signing more than 140 executive orders to unilaterally achieve his policy aims and seek retribution against his political adversaries.

    Trump’s sit-down interview came as his approval rating has taken a considerable hit, falling to 39% in a new poll from The Washington Post, ABC News and Ipsos, amid concerns about the economy and his aggressive use of tariffs.

    Nevertheless, Trump agreed with an observation than he’s having more fun ‒ blowing up Washington “with a twinkle in his eye,” as one close ally ‒ so far during his return to the White House.

    “I’m having a lot of fun, considering what I do,” Trump said. “You know, what I do is such serious stuff.”

    Trump remarked on the friendly reception he’s gotten from many in the billionaire class, including Meta founder Mark Zuckerberg and Amazon founder Jeff Bezos, during his second term.

    “It’s just a higher level of respect. I don’t know,” Trump said. “Maybe they didn’t know me at the beginning, and they know me now.”

    The interview, conducted April 24 by Atlantic reporters Ashley Parker and Michael Scherer, took place after Trump broadcasted on his social media platform Truth Social that he agreed to take part “out of curiosity, and as a competition with myself, just to see if it’s possible for The Atlantic to be ‘truthful.’” Trump ripped the publication in a social media post weeks earlier as he denied the magazine’s request for an interview, only to later change his mind.

    Trump has a long-running feud with The Atlantic that dates back to the magazine reporting that Trump referred to U.S. soldiers who died in combat as “suckers” and “losers.”

    Also in the Oval Office for the interview was Jeffrey Goldberg, The Atlantic’s editor, whose inadvertent inclusion in a Signal chat of top Trump national security officials exposed Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth sharing plans for U.S. airstrikes on Houthi targets in Yemen in the commercial messaging app.

    Trump on Hegseth: ‘He’s gonna get it together’

    Asked about the embattled Hegseth, Trump told The Atlantic: “I think he’s gonna get it together.”

    Hegseth is facing renewed scrutiny following reports revealed he shared the timing of U.S. air strikes on Houthi rebels with his wife and brother in a separate Signal chat. A former top Pentagon spokesman described a “month of total chaos” under Hegseth’s leadership. And last week, CBS News reported Hegseth had a make-up room installed for him next to the Pentagon briefing room. Hegseth has fired multiple Pentagon “leakers” he’s accused of being responsible for unflattering stories about him.

    “I had a talk with him, a positive talk, but I had a talk with him,” Trump said of Hegseth.

    Trump was also asked about the possibility of seeking a third term in the White House ‒ an idea he keeps floating, even though the Constitution says explicitly no one can be elected more than twice to the presidency.

    Trump told the Atlantic that he has not tasked the Justice Department to look into the legality of running again, but as he has done for weeks, left the door open to it.

    “That would be a big shattering, wouldn’t it?” Trump said with a laugh. “Well, maybe I’m just trying to shatter.”

    Despite Trump’s public hostility toward the media ‒ who he again labeled the “enemy of the people” in a Truth Social post Monday ‒ Trump also sat down recently for an interview with Time magazine and will take part in an interview Tuesday by ABC News marking his first 100 days in office.

    (This article has been updated to clarify Trump’s comments.)

    Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.

  • Power outage in Europe could have been from a rare atmospheric event

    Power outage in Europe could have been from a rare atmospheric event

    play

    • Millions were left without power across Europe, primarily in Spain.
    • Induced atmospheric vibrations, caused by rapid temperature or wind speed changes, can impact power lines anywhere, including the U.S.

    Preliminary reports out of Europe about the massive blackout that left millions powerless say the cause may have been something called “induced atmospheric vibration,” a rare phenomenon where weather changes affect power lines.

    The outage was centered in Spain on Monday, where the lack of power caused widespread chaos. Renfe, Spain’s national railway company, said on social media that the “entire national electricity grid was cut off” at 12:30 local time.

    It brought parts of Spain and Portugal to a standstill, grounding planes, halting public transport, and forcing some hospitals to suspend routine operations.

    Portuguese energy company REN suggested that “due to extreme temperature variations in the interior of Spain, there were anomalous oscillations in the very high voltage lines (400 KV), a phenomenon known as ‘induced atmospheric vibration,’” according to a BBC.com report.

    Could a similar power outage happen in US?

    Spain’s Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez said a “strong oscillation” was behind the outage but said no conclusions about the cause could be determined yet, Weather.com said.

    AccuWeather meteorologist Dan DePodwin told USA TODAY that “induced atmospheric vibrations” are rare but can occur because of rapid changes in temperature or wind speed. “The atmosphere does something to induce vibrations in power lines, which can lead to outages,” he said.

    He said that either quick temperature changes or an extended period of extreme temperatures can trigger the phenomenon.

    DePodwin added that it can occur “anywhere there are transmission lines,” including here in the U.S.

    Risks are known in the industry

    According to the Guardian, the risks to electrical systems from big variations in temperatures are well known in the industry, even if it is rare for problems to reach this scale.

    These variations cause synchronization failures between electrical systems, Forexlive.com News reported.

    “Due to the variation of the temperature, the parameters of the conductor change slightly,” Taco Engelaar, managing director at Neara, a software provider to energy utilities, told the Guardian. “It creates an imbalance in the frequency.”

    Contributing: Reuters

  • Federal student loan collections begin in May: Here’s what to know

    Federal student loan collections begin in May: Here’s what to know

    play

    With just a few days until May, the federal government will soon resume involuntary collections for borrowers with defaulted loans.

    Former President Joe Biden first announced the administrative forbearance in 2020, pausing loan payments and setting interest rates to 0% from March 13, 2020 to Sept. 1, 2023

    The Biden administration announced multiple extensions on the repayment pauses, including an announcement in Dec. 2021 to extend the program for another 90 days. Most borrowers were ordered to begin paying their loans back again in October 2023, the U.S. Department of Education said.

    After President Donald Trump returned to office, his administration announced that the U.S. Department of Education would start collecting payments for defaulted federal student loans beginning May 5.

    The administration went on to say that while Congress ordered many borrowers to start making payments again in October 2023, “the Biden-Harris Administration refused to lift the collections pause and kept borrowers in a confusing limbo.”

    Today, only 38% of borrowers are caught up on their student loans, according to the Department of Education.

    Here’s what we know so far.

    When will the government begin collecting student loan payments again, and why?

    On May 5, the Department of Education will resume the process of collecting on defaulted students’ loans

    According to the department, collecting payments again will ensure taxpayers are not “shouldering the cost of federal student loans that borrowers willingly undertook to finance their postsecondary education.”

    “The Biden Administration misled borrowers: the executive branch does not have the constitutional authority to wipe debt away, nor do the loan balances simply disappear,” said U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon in a press release. “Hundreds of billions have already been transferred to taxpayers. Going forward, the Department of Education, in conjunction with the Department of Treasury, will shepherd the student loan program responsibly.”

    Also on May 5 comes the restart of the Treasury Offset Program, which collects past-due debts such as child support payments. The program matches people and businesses who owe delinquent debts with money federal agencies pay for, allowing the government to withhold money to pay delinquent debts, according to the Bureau of the Fiscal Service.

    According to the Trump administration, 42.7 million borrowers owe more than $1.6 trillion in student debt, and over 5 million borrowers have not made a payment in over 360 days.

    What is a defaulted student loan, and what is deferment?

    Defaulted student loans start with delinquency, according to Federal Student Aid, an office within the Department of Education. Student loans become past due or delinquent the first day after borrowers miss a payment. Accounts remain delinquent until borrowers pay the past due amount, choose another repayment plan or get a deferment or forbearance.

    If student loans are past due for more than 90 days, loan servicers will report the accounts to national credit bureaus, which can negatively impact credit scores, the department said.

    Some loans can also be listed as being in deferment, where borrowers don’t have to make payments, per Federal Student Aid.

    “With deferment, you won’t have to make a payment,” administrators said on the Federal Student Aid website. “However, you probably won’t be making any progress toward forgiveness or paying back your loan.”

    Deferments may be granted for those currently enrolled in school, those undergoing cancer treatment, economic hardship, graduate fellowship, military service and post-active duty, Parent PLUS borrowers, rehabilitation training and those who are unemployed.

    How do bankruptcies impact student loans?

    Per Federal Student Aid, federal student loans may be canceled if borrowers:

    • Have declared bankruptcy.
    • Have a Direct Loan, Federal Family Education Loan Program loan or Federal Perkins Loan.
    • File a separate action known as an “adversary proceeding.” Borrowers who file for adversary proceedings are essentially asking bankruptcy court to rule that repaying the loan would “impose undue hardship on you and your dependents.”

    What if I have student loans through a private lender?

    While the government will begin collections for defaulted student loans on May 5 through the Treasury Offset Program, things work differently with private lenders.

    According to the National Consumer Law Center, or NCLC, private lenders may:

    • Collect the funds themselves
    • Send accounts to a collection agency
    • Write off and sell debt to a third party debt collector, and possibly work with borrowers to help them get out of default
    • Sue borrowers

    While the government legally has to offer borrowers “get out of default” programs, private lenders are not required by law to offer them, the NCLC said.

    What steps can I take to get back on track?

    There is an online loan simulator that helps borrowers figure out which loan repayment options are best suited for them at www.studentaid.gov/loan-simulator, per Federal Student Aid.

    Officials said borrowers can also use it to decide whether to consolidate student loans.

    Other options include applying to income-driven repayment plans, which are based on “a percentage of your discretionary income,” per officials.

    Those on income-driven repayment plans must update the plans each year with their income and family size, and by the end of the repayment period, any remaining balance may be forgiven.

    All federal borrowers in default will receive notice by email over the next two weeks, per the Department of Education. The notices will push borrowers to make loan payments, enroll in an income-driven repayment plan or sign up for loan rehabilitation or consolidation.

    This story was updated to add new information.

    Contributing: Zachary Schermele

    Saleen Martin is a reporter on USA TODAY’s NOW team. She is from Norfolk, Virginia the 757. Email her at sdmartin@usatoday.com.

  • USS Harry S. Truman: Navy loses  million Super Hornet jet at sea after it fell overboard from aircraft carrier

    USS Harry S. Truman: Navy loses $60 million Super Hornet jet at sea after it fell overboard from aircraft carrier



    CNN
     — 

    A US Navy F/A-18 Super Hornet fighter jet has been “lost” at sea after it fell overboard from the USS Harry S. Truman aircraft carrier while it was being towed on board, the Navy said in a statement on Monday.

    A US official said that initial reports from the scene indicated that the Truman made a hard turn to evade Houthi fire, which contributed to the fighter jet falling overboard. The Houthi rebel group claimed on Monday to have launched a drone and missile attack on the aircraft carrier, which is in the Red Sea as part of the US military’s major anti-Houthi operation.

    All personnel are accounted for, and one sailor sustained a minor injury.

    “The F/A-18E was actively under tow in the hangar bay when the move crew lost control of the aircraft. The aircraft and tow tractor were lost overboard,” the statement said. “Sailors towing the aircraft took immediate action to move clear of the aircraft before it fell overboard. An investigation is underway.”

    A second US official told CNN that the aircraft had sunk. An individual F/A-18 fighter jet costs more than $60 million, according to the Navy.

    The Truman Carrier Strike Group is currently deployed in the Middle East and was in the Red Sea at the time of the incident. The Navy emphasized on Monday that the strike group and its air wing “remain fully mission capable.”

    The Truman has repeatedly been targeted in attacks by the Iran-backed Houthis in Yemen. It made headlines in February when it collided with a merchant ship near Egypt; no injuries were reported. Another F/A-18 from the Truman was also “mistakenly fired” upon and shot down by the USS Gettysburg in the Red Sea in December ; both pilots ejected safely.

  • Biden praises Pope Francis, takes unnamed swipe at Trump in op-ed

    Biden praises Pope Francis, takes unnamed swipe at Trump in op-ed

    play

    Former President Joe Biden decried the “politics of dehumanization” in a USA TODAY op-ed Monday praising the late Pope Francis that some may interpret as a thinly veiled swipe at his White House successor.

    Biden, a practing Catholic, joined President Donald Trump  and other world leaders who attended the 88-year-old pontiff’s funeral over the weekend. It marked the first time the two U.S. political rivals, who continue trading barbs, had been at the same event since Trump’s Jan. 20 inauguration.

    “Francis was a pope for our time, when so many leaders embraced cruelty. He stood for compassion,” Biden said in the op-end. “When so many casually embraced lies. He stood for truth.”

    The former president, who left office with an abysmal 36% approval rating, went further when bringing up Francis’ views on world affairs, particularly the treatment of migrants, which has become politically polarizing.

    “(Francis) called out the cruelty being inflicted on others,” Biden wrote. “He spoke against the demonization of the weakest among us: ‘How much contempt is stirred up at times towards the vulnerable, the marginalized, and migrants!’”

    Trump has implemented several new measures in his pursuit to deport millions of undocumented immigrants, such as invoking the seldom-used 1798 Alien Enemies Act to immediately deport the Venezuelan nationals suspected of gang activity.

    “If we don’t get these criminals out of our country, we are not going to have a country any longer,” Trump said in an April 21 post on Truth Social.

    Biden has been more direct in other remarks taking on Trump since leaving the White House, such when he accused the president of “taking a hatchet” to the Social Security Administration as part of the administration’s larger federal cutbacks and layoffs.

    For his part, Trump hasn’t let up on Biden either and has at various moments bashed his Democratic foe directly in speeches, social media posts and through executive orders.

    During the White House’s annual Easter Egg Roll last week, for instance, Trump mocked Biden for being redirected byanaide dressed in a bunny costume. “Do you remember the bunny with Joe Biden?” the president asked children at the event. “Do you remember when the bunny took Joe Biden out? He’s not taking Trump out.”

    Biden is one of the president’s easier punching bags in part because of the continued fallout within the Democratic Party, which is searching for new, younger voices to make the case against Trump 2.0.

    Many progressives remain split over the 2024 presidential election, including how the party handled questions about Biden’s acuity while in office. He was faced with significant second-guessing from fellow Democrats about his ability to finish the race before ultimately deciding to end his campaign.

    Contributing: Joey Garrison

  • Supreme Court could side with disabled student in discrimination case

    Supreme Court could side with disabled student in discrimination case


    The high court is likely to rule discrimination suits related to education don’t face a higher bar.

    play

    WASHINGTON − For years, Gina and Aaron Tharpe argued that a local school district hadn’t done enough to accommodate their daughter, who has a rare form of epilepsy and severe cognitive impairment. An administrative judge in 2021 agreed, saying the reasons the Minnesota school provided for not offering Ava a full day of class under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act were “not credible.”

    The Tharpes, however, also sought help under two other federal laws that protect people with disabilities from discrimination, hoping to get a stronger court order as well as compensation for having hired specialists to help with Ava’s needs.

    This time, however, the courts sided with the Osseo Area School District, saying the district hadn’t demonstrated “bad faith or gross misjudgment” during the dispute.

    That’s a tougher standard for suing under the Americans with Disabilities Act and under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act than the courts apply in cases that don’t involve a school’s alleged failure to meet its obligations under the IDEA.

    The Supreme Court on Monday sounded likely to side with the Tharpes in overturning that decision.

    That’s in part because lawyers for the school district agreed that that there’s not a two-tiered system.

    But Lisa Blatt, who represented the school district, pushed the court to apply a tougher standard for all cases rather than lowering the bar for cases like Ava’s.

    That generated pushback not just from the Tharpe’s attorney, but also from the justices who had not thought, when they agreed to take the case, that the school was making that consequential an argument.

    “It strikes me as a pretty big deal,” Justice Amy Coney Barrett said of the standard the school district is asking for, which she said would be a “sea change” for disability discrimination cases.

    Justice Sonia Sotomayor questioned whether the school district had violated the court’s procedural rules.

    “It would’ve been nice to have known that we were biting off that big a chunk,” she said.

    Roman Martinez, an attorney for the Tharpes, told the justices disability rights groups who would have “rung a five-alarm fire” if they had thought that’s what the school district was asking for.

    Closely watched by disability rights groups

    The case was already being closely watched by disability rights groups who say the courts have created a “nearly insurmountable barrier” for help sought by schoolchildren and their families.

    But school officials across the country worry that making lawsuits for damages easier to win will create a more adversarial relationship between parents and schools in the difficult negotiations needed to balance a student’s needs with a school’s limited resources.

    Litigation will also shrink those resources, lawyers for a national association of school superintendents and other educational groups told the Supreme Court in urging the justices to “proceed with caution.”

    Morning seizures prevented a typical school schedule

    The dispute started when the Tharpes moved in 2015 to a Twins City suburb from Tennessee where they said Ava’s needs had been accommodated.

    Her seizures are so frequent in the morning that she can’t attend school before noon. Ava’s Tennessee school shifted her school day so it started in the afternoon and ended with evening instruction at home.

    But the Tharpes say her Minnesota school refused to provide the same adjustment. As a result, she received only 4.25 hours of instruction a day, just 65% of what non-disabled students received.

    And as Ava prepared to enter middle school, that time was going to shrink further.

    The Tharpes then went to court.

    Ava wins IDEA claim but blocked from other suits

    An administrative law judge said the school district’s top concern hadn’t been Ava’s needs but a desire to keep employees from having to work past the traditional end of the school day. The district was required to provide more instruction under the IDEA.

    But while a federal judge backed that decision, the judge said the Tharpes couldn’t also use the ADA or the Rehabilitation Act to seek compensatory damages and an injunction to permanently set the hours of instruction.

     The St. Louis-based 8th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals likewise said their hands were tied because of a 1982 decision from that circuit – Monahan v. Nebraska − that said school officials need to have acted with “bad faith or gross misjudgment” for suits involving educational services for children with disabilities.

    The Tharpes “may have established a genuine dispute about whether the district was negligent or even deliberately indifferent, but under Monahan, that’s just not enough,” the appeals court said.

    `Hundreds of other court cases have applied tougher standard

    Hundreds of district court decisions across the country have been litigated under that standard, with most of them ending in a loss for the families, according to the Tharpes’ attorneys.

    Those courts are unfairly using a tougher standard than “deliberate indifference,” which is the bar for damages in disability discrimination cases outside the school setting, their attorneys argue.

    That position is backed by the Justice Department.

    “There is no sound basis for applying different intent requirements,” Nicole Reaves, a Justice Department attorney, told the court.

    Reaves said the school district is asking for a “breathtakingly broad rule” that no discrimination claims can be brought without an intent to discriminate.

    Blatt, the attorney for the school district, said the courts can choose to “level down” or “level up.”

    “This is a big deal,” Blatt said, agreeing with Barrett about what’s at stake. “I understand that you don’t want to take on this case but I didn’t bring this petition. This petition said, `decide the standard.’”

    But Chief Justice John Roberts said the court wasn’t asked to decide what the uniform standard should be, just whether there should be a different standard for discrimination claims arising out of the IDEA.

    A decision in A.J.T. v. Osseo Area Schools is expected by summer.

  • When do I get the SSI check for May? See full 2025 payment schedule

    When do I get the SSI check for May? See full 2025 payment schedule

    play

    This is one of those months when some Social Security recipients may have three checks hit their bank account.

    Those who get Supplemental Security Income checks will get two checks in the month of May – one for May and another for June – due to quirks in the Social Security Administration’s calendar.

    About 7.4 million Americans who may be disabled or have limited resources get monthly SSI benefit payments. About one-third of those SSI recipients also get a benefit from Social Security. Those folks will wind up with three benefits payments hitting their account during the calendar month of May.

    Traditional Social Security payments – for those who are older or retired – are issued on Wednesdays throughout the month for most recipients. If your birthdate falls between the first and 10th of the month, that mean you are paid on the second Wednesday of the month, which this month is May 14; between the 11th and 20th, you’re paid on the third Wednesday (May 21), and if you were born after the 20th of the month, you get paid on the fourth Wednesday of the month (May 28), according to the SSA calendar.

    Social Security recipients who began getting benefits before May 1997 are paid on the 3rd of the month – if they also get SSI, that benefit comes on the 1st.

    SSI payment calendar: Months with two checks ahead

    As it was in February, SSI recipients will get two checks in the month of May. The May SSI payment is scheduled to be issued on May 1, according to the SSA calendar, and the June SSI payment is scheduled for May 30. The June payment is issued early because June 1 falls on a weekend.

    That means in June, as it was in March, SSI beneficiaries will not get a payment in that calendar month.

    This recurring calendar quirk crops up again in August when SSI recipients will get two checks – the August payment on Aug. 1 and the September payment on Aug. 29 – but no payment in the calendar month of September.

    SSI recipients will also get two checks in October, but not one in the calendar month of November, according to the SSA calendar.

    When are SSI payments sent out for April? See full 2025 payment schedule

    Supplemental Security Income checks will be sent out on the following dates in 2025, according to the SSA calendar.

    • Thursday, May 1, 2025 (Check for May 2025)
    • Friday, May 30, 2025 (Check for June 2025)
    • Tuesday, July 1, 2025 (Check for July 2025)
    • Friday, Aug. 1, 2025 (Check for August 2025)
    • Friday, Aug. 29, 2025 (Check for September 2025)
    • Wednesday, Oct. 1, 2025 (Check for October 2025)
    • Friday, Oct. 31, 2025 (Check for November 2025)
    • Monday, Dec. 1, 2025 (Check for December 2025)
    • Wednesday, Dec. 31, 2025 (Check for January 2026)

    What is SSI?

    Supplemental Security Income is a benefit payment for those with limited income or resources aged 65 or older, who are blind or have a qualifying disability. Children with a qualifying disability can also get SSI, according to the SSA’s website.

    Adults who earn more than $2,019 from work monthly, typically do not qualify for SSI.

    Mike Snider is a reporter on USA TODAY’s Trending team. You can follow him on Threads, Bluesky, X and email him at mikegsnider  &  @mikegsnider.bsky.social  &  @mikesnider & msnider@usatoday.com

    What’s everyone talking about? Sign up for our trending newsletter to get the latest news of the day

  • Spain, Portugal affected by massive power outage Monday

    Spain, Portugal affected by massive power outage Monday

    A massive power outage appears to have affected large portions of Spain and Portugal Monday.

    Red Electrica, the operator of Spain’s power grid, said on social media Monday morning that voltage has been recovered in substations in several areas in the north, south, and west of the peninsula. The agency also said it was continuing to work with all of its resources to restore power throughout the entire country as soon as possible.

    Red Electrica said early Monday morning the cause of the outage was being analyzed. “All resources are being dedicated to solving it,” the agency said on X.

    Spanish Prime Minister Pedro Sanchez held an “extraordinary” meeting of the country’s national security council starting at 3 p.m. local time, according to the official X account for the Spanish government.

    ‘Entire national electricity grid was cut off’

    Renfe, Spain’s national railway company, said on social media Monday the “entire national electricity grid was cut off” at 12:30 local time, and that trains were stopped and without departures at all stations.

    The railway posted on social media hours later, saying service “remains suspended due to lack of electricity supply.”

    The British Broadcasting Corporation, citing local reports, said the outage caused traffic jams in the center of the Spanish capital of Madrid due to traffic lights not working. The Madrid Open, a professional tennis tournament held in the capital, has also been suspended due to the outages.

    Parts of Barcelona and Lisbon were also affected by the outage, with public transport, traffic lights, and phone services mostly down, according to Bloomberg.

    This story has been updated to add new information.

    Gabe Hauari is a national trending news reporter at USA TODAY. You can follow him on X @GabeHauari or email him at Gdhauari@gannett.com.